How Much Weight Can a 45-Degree Square Steel Tube Structure Support?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the structural integrity of a hanging fire pit supported by three lengths of square steel tubes arranged at a 45-degree angle. Participants are exploring the maximum weight these tubes can support without deforming, considering factors such as material properties, design stability, and load distribution. The conversation includes technical calculations and design considerations related to the project.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that the 20x20mm square tubes may not support significant loads without additional bracing.
  • Others argue that the bending forces on the tubes will be negligible, with most of the load being longitudinal, thus focusing on buckling/compressive strength instead.
  • A participant mentions that the maximum column load for a specific tube size is approximately 374 lbs, suggesting that the frame could theoretically support around 1122 lbs if load distribution is perfect.
  • Another participant emphasizes that heating from a fire could reduce the strength of the steel, impacting load capacity.
  • Some participants discuss the importance of the hinge-jointed design, noting that this affects how the structure behaves under load.
  • There is a suggestion that if the legs are not restrained, they will primarily experience compression, with a calculation provided for the load distribution at a 45-degree angle.
  • One participant shares a personal experience with a similar design, indicating that a different material (3/8" round steel rods) successfully supported a load, suggesting that the design's effectiveness may vary with different materials and configurations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the maximum weight the structure can support, with multiple competing views on the adequacy of the design and the calculations involved. Concerns about stability and load distribution remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding material properties and structural behavior, but these assumptions are not universally accepted. The discussion includes references to specific standards and calculations that may depend on additional information not provided in the thread.

pHartless
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
I have a problem to do with my project in college. I'm creating a hanging fire pit, basically made of 3 lengths of square steel bar connected to a plate at the top and on hinges. The 3 legs of the frame move in slots and when in the open position would be at 45 degrees. The actual fire pit is hanging from the plate via a chain. My problem is that my tutor argues the weight of the chain/fire pit would cause the square tubes to bend when in the open position, but me and another tutor argue it would not- and none of know how to go about calculating it.

So does anybody know the maximum weight 3 20x20mm square steel tubes when arranged at 45 degrees like I described would be able to take before deforming?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Please post a clear diagram of the assembly .
 
upload_2017-5-13_14-0-16.png
 
pHartless said:
I have a problem to do with my project in college. I'm creating a hanging fire pit, basically made of 3 lengths of square steel bar connected to a plate at the top and on hinges. The 3 legs of the frame move in slots and when in the open position would be at 45 degrees. The actual fire pit is hanging from the plate via a chain. My problem is that my tutor argues the weight of the chain/fire pit would cause the square tubes to bend when in the open position, but me and another tutor argue it would not- and none of know how to go about calculating it.

So does anybody know the maximum weight 3 20x20mm square steel tubes when arranged at 45 degrees like I described would be able to take before deforming?

Is this designed as using square bar, or square tube? If it is tube, what is the wall thickness of the tube?
 
It is using square tube, wall thickness being 2mm
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RogueOne
(1) Intuitively 20 mm square tubes which are 1850 mm long would seem to be a bit feeble to support any significant load unless they were additionally braced somehow .

(2) Even if the actual legs were adequate for your purpose I would still be concerned about the stability of the tripod because there does not seem to be any very reliable means of stopping the legs spreading and causing the tripod to collapse as a mechanism .

(3) Try modifying the design and post a new sketch when you have finished .
 
Last edited:
the legs move in slots in a plate just below the plate they are attached to by the hinges, which prevents them from spreading. Can you not scrutinize my design I'm not asking you for design advice, my question was what's the maximum weight they could take before deforming and if you can help me with that great.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RogueOne
Actually, his question clarified for me that this structure can be thought of as a space frame, which makes it much more simple to calculate.

The bending forces put on the tubes will be negligible. Most of the laod will be longitudinal to the tube's lengths. So this becomes a question, mostly, of their buckling/compressive strength.

The amount of load that can be applied downward by a chain connected to the top, theoretically, will be 3x the buckling strength of one of those square tubes. Do you know any of the ansi standards for the tube that you want to use? If not, I could make assumptions and tell you an approximate strength.
 
For a 73" long square tube with a .065" (16 gauge) wall thickness made of steel, The maximum column load is 374lbs.

If you make your frame precisely enough to distribute that load perfectly, then your frame will accept somewhere around 1122lbs net weight hanging from the top of them.

However, if you actually light a fire in that hanging grate, then the steel will heat up. If it gets hot enough from the fire, it will lose strength.
 
  • #10
Look it up in the Machinist Hand Book formulas are there. Compression strength is many times stronger than bending strength for 3 legs at a 45 degree angle. 20mm will be very strong.

I built 1 of those for camping from 3/8" round steel rods it holds up a 15 lb pot of stew easy over the fire. 3/8" hollow rods would have been better much lighter weight for hauling around. My 3 legs were about 5 ft tall at 30 degree angle.
.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RogueOne
  • #11
Keep in mind that the tubes are hinge-jointed. "pin jointed" describes it as well. That is important in defining this structure.
 
  • #12
In that arrangement, assuming the legs aren't restrained i.e. pin jointed, at the top from moving wider, the legs are purely in compression. At 45degrees, the load on each is the weight*(root2)/3. That does make for an slightly unstable tripod though. Unless the tubes are bent to start with, they are unlikely to buckle. A larger, thinner wall tube will be even stiffer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
47K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K