4 momentum is particle physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of minimum kinetic energy required for a positron to strike an electron at rest, resulting in the creation of two pions. Participants clarify that momentum is conserved in the lab frame and that the pions will move with the same velocity, thus maintaining relative rest. The conversation emphasizes the importance of equating invariant masses for simpler calculations and highlights the relationship between energy equivalence and invariant mass in particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-momentum in particle physics
  • Familiarity with conservation laws (momentum and energy)
  • Knowledge of invariant mass calculations
  • Basic concepts of particle interactions and threshold energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of four-momentum in detail
  • Learn about invariant mass and its applications in particle collisions
  • Explore conservation laws in different reference frames
  • Investigate threshold energy calculations for particle creation
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying high-energy physics, and anyone interested in the mechanics of particle interactions and energy calculations.

fengqiu
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Okay so i have a question for you guys
if I have a positron striking an electron at rest to create 2 pions( + and -) and I want to calculate the minimum kinnetic energy that the electrons can possesses to create these pions... then the created pions will be at rest correct?
so this gives me two four vectors
[Ee++Ee-,Pe+C,0,0)
the other one being
[Epi++Epi-,0,0,0]
now what really confuses me is.
1) momentum isn't conserved? we're still in the same frame of refernce ie lab frame, shouldn't momentum be conserved?
2) is energy conserved? if so when i equate the energies and equate the four vector length (invariant mass) i get different answers?

Thanks for your help!

Adam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fengqiu said:
then the created pions will be at rest correct?
Incorrect, this would - as you have noticed - violate conservation of momentum.

The pions will be created at relative rest, i.e., they will be moving with the same velocity.
 
Orodruin said:
Incorrect, this would - as you have noticed - violate conservation of momentum.

The pions will be created at relative rest, i.e., they will be moving with the same velocity.
oh okay... so if they have the same velocity... that makes a bit more sense...
OKAY I'm still confused about the energies. could i not just solve the equation by equating the energies?

Cheers\

Adam
 
Yes. You can do either, equating the invariant masses is simpler.

In order for us to figure out where you go wrong, you must provide us with your actual computations, i.e., you must show us what you do, not only tell us what you do.
 
i'm just crunching through the calculations now, I'll get back to you if i get the right answer, sorry one more question is that how do you know the pions are going at equal velocities?
 
fengqiu said:
i'm just crunching through the calculations now, I'll get back to you if i get the right answer, sorry one more question is that how do you know the pions are going at equal velocities?

They do not need to do so if there is more energy available. The invariant mass of the two pions is the smallest when they do and therefore it represents the threshold value, i.e., when the electrons need the least invariant mass - translating to the lowest energy possible.
 
Orodruin said:
The invariant mass of the two pions is the smallest when they do

To specify, call the pion 4-momenta ##p_1## and ##p_2##, respectively. This leads to
$$
s = (p_1+p_2)^2 = 2 m_\pi^2 + 2 p_1\cdot p_2.
$$
You can compute the inner product ##p_1 \cdot p_2## in any frame since it is Lorentz invariant. Computing it in the rest frame of the first pion gives ##p_1 = (m_\pi,0)## and ##p_2 = (m_\pi + T_\pi,p_\pi)##, where ##T_\pi## and ##p_\pi## are the kinetic energy and momentum of the second pion in the rest frame of the first. Hence
$$
s = 4 m_\pi^2 + 2m_\pi T_\pi \geq 4 m_\pi^2,
$$
with equality when ##T_\pi = 0##, i.e., when the pions are at relative rest.
 
you, Orodruin are the man!
thanks for your help
it turns out that we get the same equation for energy equivalence and invariant mass
that makes a lot more sense
 
fengqiu said:
you, Orodruin are the man!

Not really, I have just been teaching this stuff for six years and make a living as a particle physicist ...
 
  • Like
Likes mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K