Moving Center of Mass Collisions

In summary: I count 300kev kinetic + rest mass in the collision's center of mass frame (& also 300kev kinetic + rest mass in the detector/accelerator rest frame)But if the particle bunches are both initially heading the same direction with different energies relative to the accelerator/detector:Car "A" 100 mph --> Car "B" 50mph --> * = 50mph relative velocity collision200kev kinetic electron --> 100kev kinetic positron --> * =...rest mass + 100kev kineticI count 100kev kinetic (between the particles) + rest mass in the collision's center of mass rest frame (but still 300
  • #1
metastable
514
53
If I fire an electron and positron bunch both in the same direction away from my experimental accelerator rest frame such that the electron bunch is fired with higher energy towards a "read end" collision with an already fired positron bunch and they collide a short distance away from the accelerator inside a chamber of full of detectors completely surrounding the collision. Before the collision both bunches have substantially similar momentum vector away from the accelerator. After the collision I expect the energies of the detected photons to add up to the rest energies of the annihilated particles plus the additional kinetic energy of the electron and positron bunches moving relative to the detector. But when I look at the momentum vectors of the some of the photons, they appear to have changed up to 180 degrees from the original momentum vectors of the electron-positron bunches (ie I expect some of the detected radiation to be heading in the momentum vector back towards the accelerator). The part I don't understand is where did the energy come from to change the momentum vectors of the radiation back towards the accelerator? Why does it consume no energy to change these vectors, such that the photons add up to the rest mass + kinetic energy (ie is there no energy allotment for changing the vector of the radiation detected heading back towards the accelerator)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Did you write down the momenta and energies? The sum is the same before and after the process. Your massive particles have quite a lot of momentum.
 
  • #4
The collisions appear to be neither elastic nor inelastic, as in either case the mass/energy would continue its path away from the accelerator.
elastic-inelastic.jpg
 

Attachments

  • elastic-inelastic.jpg
    elastic-inelastic.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 391
  • #5
You can't expect descriptions of collisions of macroscopic objects to work for annihilation processes.
 
  • #6
metastable said:
. But when I look at the momentum vectors of the some of the photons,

How exactly did you do this? Do you have your own collider and detector?
 
  • #7
I had asked mfb privately what mechanism would prevent radiation from proceeding back towards the accelerator in such a collision and his reply indicated there would be no such mechanism.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
... and?
If you throw a hand grenade away you can still get hit by its fragments. Same concept.

You didn't answer my question from post 3.
 
  • #9
mfb said:
You didn't answer my question from post 3.

Ok suppose a 1 coulomb bunch of positrons acquires 100kev per particle relative to the rest frame of the accelerator, then a 1 coulomb bunch of electrons acquires 200kev per particle energy along the same vector and collides with the positron bunch, so I have 2 coulombs of electron-positron rest mass + 1 coulomb @ 200kev per particle kinetic + 1 coulomb @ 100kev per particle kinetic energy entering the detector chamber, how do I assess the photon energies I could expect to see heading back towards the accelerator as well as towards other areas of the detection chamber?
 
  • #10
You didn't answer my question from post 6.
 
  • #11
metastable said:
how do I assess the photon energies I could expect to see heading back towards the accelerator as well as towards other areas of the detection chamber?
Use conservation of energy and momentum.
 
  • #12
mfb said:
Use conservation of energy and momentum.

If the electron-positron pairs are traveling in opposite directions with combined 300kev kinetic:

200kev kinetic electron --> * <-- 100kev kinetic positron

I count 300kev kinetic + rest mass in the collision's center of mass frame (& also 300kev kinetic + rest mass in the detector/accelerator rest frame)

But if the particle bunches are both initially heading the same direction with different energies relative to the accelerator/detector:

200kev kinetic electron --> 100kev kinetic positron --> *

As the electrons move in the direction of the positrons, the positrons are still moving in the direction away from the electrons from the detector's rest frame, so I've probably made a mistake but now I only count 100kev kinetic (between the particles) + rest mass in the collision's center of mass rest frame (but still 300kev in the detector rest frame)

So in a collision between the 200kev electron bunch -> 100kev positron bunch initially traveling along the same vector do I expect to detect photons totaling (rest mass + 300kev) or photons totaling (rest mass + 100kev) in the rest frame of the detector?

--------------------------

I attempt the analogy of a car collision (head on vs rear end):

Car "A" 100 mph --> * <-- Car "B" 50mph = 150mph relative velocity collision
200kev kinetic electron --> * <-- 100kev kinetic positron = rest mass + 300kev kinetic

Car "A" 100 mph --> Car "B" 50mph --> * = 50mph relative velocity collision
200kev kinetic electron --> 100kev kinetic positron --> * = rest mass + 100kev kinetic
 
Last edited:
  • #13
metastable said:
I count 300kev kinetic + rest mass in the collision's center of mass frame (& also 300kev kinetic + rest mass in the detector/accelerator rest frame)
No, the sum of kinetic energies will be lower in the center of mass frame.
Do the calculations. Don't just assume something and then be surprised that it leads to strange results.
metastable said:
so I've probably made a mistake but now I only count 100kev kinetic (between the particles) + rest mass in the collision's center of mass rest frame
Again: Do the calculations, don't just assume something. In the center of mass frame the total kinetic energy is lower than 100 keV.
metastable said:
So in a collision between the 200kev electron bunch -> 100kev positron bunch initially traveling along the same vector do I expect to detect photons totaling (rest mass + 300kev) or photons totaling (rest mass + 100kev) in the rest frame of the detector?
Energy is conserved in every frame. Different frames will get different values for the total energy, that is no problem.
 
  • #14
mfb said:
Energy is conserved in every frame. Different frames will get different values for the total energy, that is no problem.

So with many repetitions of this experiment with 2 accelerators:

Lab Frame Detector/Accelerator --> 10gev kinetic electron --> <--*Collision*--> <-- 10gev kinetic positron <-- Lab Frame Detector/Accelerator

^I expect to detect some radiation other than gamma photons at the detectors because the 10gev + 10gev combined kinetic energy + rest mass is sufficient energy to produce other particles

If I modify experiment such that both particles are fired sequentially in the same vector from the same accelerator:

Lab Frame Detector/Accelerator --> 10gev + 1ev kinetic electron --> 10gev kinetic positron --> <--*Collision*--> Lab Frame Detector

Initially from the rest frame of the positron, the electron only has 1ev kinetic energy in the vector towards it available for the collision, because both particles move away from the accelerator with 10gev each plus the electron's 1 extra ev of kinetic energy. Is it sufficient to produce any other particles besides gamma? Or will I only detect gamma rays at the detectors? Will the 20gev + 1 ev + 0.510mev + 0.510mev mass/energy seen entering the chamber be observed by the lab frame detectors as gamma photons with total energy equivalent to 0.510mev + 0.510mev + 20gev + 1ev?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Enough already!

You are wasting everybody's time. Mfb was 100% right when he said Do the calculations. Don't just assume something and then be surprised that it leads to strange results. As far as I can tell, you are making up situations and guessing at the answer without doing the calculations and then being surprised at the "answer". That's not going to work very well. Neither is adding complication on top of complication before you have the basics down.
 
  • #16
I'm not making things up, I'm trying to solve the following problem, but instead of assuming opposite directions and low energy I want to solve for when the particles have higher energy and that the particles are initially on the same vector with different energies:
problem.jpg
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 404
  • #17
Then you should start by a) understanding that calculation and b) understand the conceptual differences between this problem and your variations on it.
 
  • #18
metastable said:
Initially from the rest frame of the positron, the electron only has 1ev kinetic energy in the vector towards it available for the collision
No, the energy will be different.

This thread is going nowhere, I closed it. If you stop making assumptions and actually calculate what happens feel free to send me a message, then I will open the thread again.
 

1. What is the moving center of mass in collisions?

The moving center of mass in collisions refers to the point at which the total mass of a system can be considered to be located, taking into account the velocities and positions of all the individual particles involved in the collision. It is the point at which the system would balance if it were placed on a scale.

2. How does the moving center of mass affect collisions?

The moving center of mass plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of a collision. If the center of mass remains stationary before and after the collision, then the total momentum and kinetic energy of the system will remain the same. However, if the center of mass is moving, then the total momentum and energy of the system will change.

3. What factors affect the movement of the center of mass in collisions?

The movement of the center of mass in collisions is affected by the masses and velocities of the objects involved. The heavier and faster-moving object will have a greater influence on the center of mass. Additionally, external forces, such as friction or air resistance, can also affect the movement of the center of mass.

4. How is the center of mass calculated in collisions?

The center of mass can be calculated using the following equation:

xcm = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ... + mnxn) / (m1 + m2 + ... + mn)

Where xcm is the position of the center of mass, mn is the mass of each object, and xn is the position of each object.

5. How can the concept of the center of mass be applied in real-world situations?

The concept of the center of mass is used in various fields, including physics, engineering, and sports. In physics, it is used to analyze collisions and determine the outcome of a system. In engineering, it is used to design stable structures and vehicles. In sports, it is used to improve balance and performance, such as in diving or gymnastics.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
708
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
866
Back
Top