400kJ of work is exerted to reduce a car's velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeEngineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the mass of a car given that 400,000 Joules of work is required to reduce its velocity from 30 m/s to 15 m/s. The relevant equation used is the kinetic energy formula, KE = 0.5 * m * v^2. The solution derived indicates that the mass of the car is 1185 kg. Participants confirm that using kinetic energy is an acceptable approach, although there is a note that the work done should be considered negative when reducing speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy equations, specifically KE = 0.5 * m * v^2
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
  • Familiarity with concepts of work and energy in physics
  • Knowledge of velocity and its impact on kinetic energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of work-energy principle in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between force, displacement, and work
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, such as variable forces
  • Investigate the implications of positive and negative work in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in motion.

WannabeEngineer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Problem Statement: 4*10^5 Joules of work is required to reduce a car's velocity from 30m/s to 15m/s. What is the car's mass?

Relevant equations: Ke=.5*m*v^2

The attempt at a solution:

V1 = 30m/s
V2 = 15m/s
M = mass of car

.5*M*V1^2 - 4*10^5J = .5*M*V2^2

450M - 4*10^5J = 112.5M

-4*10^2 = -337.5M
1185kg = M

My Question: My algebra checks out I think, my only question is if I approached the problem correctly. The question is phrased in terms of work, so do I need to find force and displacement? Or is using the equation for kinetic energy acceptable?

Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using KE is fine. You cannot readily use force and displacement because you have no idea how the force varies over time. It can be done, but it's unnecessary extra work.
It does bother me a bit that the question says a positive quantity of work has to be done to reduce the car's speed. It should be a negative quantity, of course.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
938
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K