MHB -412.7.3 decide if cosets of H are the same

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Let $H=\{0;\pm 3;\pm 6;\pm 9;\cdots\}$.
$\textit{ Use }$
$$aH=bH \textit{ or }aH\cap bH=\oslash$$
$\textit{then..}$
$$aH = bH \textit{ iff } (b-a) \textit{ is in } \textit{H}$$
to decide whether or not the following cosets of H are the same.
$\textsf{a. 11 + H and 17 + H}$
$\textsf{b. -1 + H and 5 + H}$
$\textsf{c. 7 + H and 23 + H}$ok not sure what the official method of this would be but for a. 11+6=17 so the coset would would be just a shift over 6 places. the same shift seens to be true for b and c however the beginning numbers would be different

however the book says that c is no
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
Let $H=\{0;\pm 3;\pm 6;\pm 9;\cdots\}$.
$\textit{ Use }$
$$aH=bH \textit{ or }aH\cap bH=\oslash$$
$\textit{then..}$
$$aH = bH \textit{ iff } (b-a) \textit{ is in } \textit{H}$$
to decide whether or not the following cosets of H are the same.
$\textsf{a. 11 + H and 17 + H}$
$\textsf{b. -1 + H and 5 + H}$
$\textsf{c. 7 + H and 23 + H}$ok not sure what the official method of this would be but for a. 11+6=17 so the coset would would be just a shift over 6 places. the same shift seens to be true for b and c however the beginning numbers would be different

however the book says that c is no
$H = \{\ldots -9;-6;-3;\ 0;\ 3;\ 6;\ 9 \ldots\}$

For a.: $11+H = \{\ldots 2;\ 5;\ 8;\ 11;\ 14;\ 17;\ 20;\ \ldots\},\quad 17+H = \{\ldots 8;\ 11;\ 14;\ 17;\ 20;\ 23;\ 25 \ldots\}$
Those two sets are the same. The numbers in the list have just been shifted by two places to get from $11+H$ to $17+H$.

For c.: $7+H = \{\ldots -2;\ 1;\ 4;\ 7;\ 10;\ 13;\ 16;\ 19;\ 22;\ 25;\ 28 \ldots\},\quad 23+H = \{\ldots 14;\ 17;\ 20;\ 23;\ 26 \ldots\}$
Those two sets are not the same. The numbers in them do not coincide at all.

Can you see what condition the shifts must satisfy in order for the two cosets to be the same?
 
Yes: your "method" works. 11+ H and 17+ H are the same because 17- 11= 6 is a multiple of 3; -1+ H and 5+ H are the same because 5- (-1)= 6 is a multiple of 3; and 7+ H and 23+ H are NOT the same because 23- 7= 16 is NOT a multiple of 3.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top