MHB *412 what value(s) of h is b in plane spanned

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the value of h for which the vector b is in the plane spanned by vectors a_1 and a_2. It is established that b must be a linear combination of a_1 and a_2, leading to the formation of an augmented matrix. After performing row reduction, it is concluded that h must equal 3 for b to lie in the plane. There is a clarification regarding the signs of the coefficients v and w, but the primary focus remains on the value of h. Ultimately, the solution confirms that h = 3 is the necessary condition for b's inclusion in the plane.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
For what value(s) of $h$ is b in the plane spanned by $a_1$ and $a_2$
$$a_1=\left[\begin{array}{r} 1\\3\\ -1 \end{array}\right],
a_2=\left[\begin{array}{r} -5\\-8\\2 \end{array}\right],
b =\left[\begin{array}{r} 3\\-5\\ \color{red}{h} \end{array}\right]$$

ok this should be obvious but I don't see it..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
For what value(s) of $h$ is b in the plane spanned by $a_1$ and $a_2$
$$a_1=\left[\begin{array}{r} 1\\3\\ -1 \end{array}\right],
a_2=\left[\begin{array}{r} -5\\-8\\2 \end{array}\right],
b =\left[\begin{array}{r} 3\\-5\\ \color{red}{h} \end{array}\right]$$

ok this should be obvious but I don't see it..
Hint: If b is in the plane formed by a_1 and a_2 then it has to be a linear combination of a_1 and a_2. ie. [math]b = v a_1 + w a_2[/math] for some v, w constants.

Can you finish?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Hint: If b is in the plane formed by a_1 and a_2 then it has to be a linear combination of a_1 and a_2. ie. [math]b = v a_1 + w a_2[/math] for some v, w constants.

Can you finish?

-Dan

$\left[\begin{array}{r} 1\\3\\ -1 \end{array}\right]v+
\left[\begin{array}{r} -5\\-8\\2 \end{array}\right]w
=\left[\begin{array}{r} 3\\-5\\ \color{red}{h} \end{array}\right]$
so then the augmented matrix would be
$\left[\begin{array}{rr|r}1 & -5 & 3 \\ 3 & -8 & -5 \\ -1 & 2 & h \end{array}\right]$
then RREF
$\left[ \begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & 0 & -7 \\0 & 1 & -2 \\ 0 & 0 & h - 3 \end{array} \right]$
so $h=3$ following would be $v=7$ and $w=2$

hopefully...
 
Last edited:
karush said:
$\left[\begin{array}{r} 1\\3\\ -1 \end{array}\right]v+
\left[\begin{array}{r} -5\\-8\\2 \end{array}\right]w
=\left[\begin{array}{r} 3\\-5\\ \color{red}{h} \end{array}\right]$
so then the augmented matrix would be
$\left[\begin{array}{rr|r}1 & -5 & 3 \\ 3 & -8 & -5 \\ -1 & 2 & h \end{array}\right]$
then RREF
$\left[ \begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & 0 & -7 \\0 & 1 & -2 \\ 0 & 0 & h - 3 \end{array} \right]$
so $h=3$ following would be $v=7$ and $w=2$

hopefully...
I didn't go looking for it but somehow you are off by a sign. v = -7 and w = -2 and h = 3 is the solution.

-Dan
 
ok I see

however the OP only asked for h

mahalo
 
karush said:
ok I see

however the OP only asked for h

mahalo
I know. It was just an FYI.

-Dan
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K