Moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the net work required to accelerate a solid cylinder, specifically a merry-go-round with a mass of 1640 kg and a radius of 7.50 m, to a rotation rate of 1.00 revolutions per 8.00 seconds. The net work is determined using the change in kinetic energy equation, yielding a result of 14211.7 J. Participants highlight the use of kinematic equations and the work-energy theorem as effective methods for solving the problem, emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying variables such as Δθ instead of Δt in torque calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem in physics
  • Knowledge of angular kinematics equations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving torque and angular acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the work-energy theorem in rotational motion
  • Learn how to calculate moment of inertia for various shapes, including cylinders
  • Explore angular kinematics equations and their applications in solving rotational problems
  • Investigate the relationship between torque, angular acceleration, and net work
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying rotational dynamics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in rotational systems.

pb23me
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A merry-go-round has a mass of 1640 kg and a radius of 7.50 m. How much net work is required to accelerate it from rest to a rotation rate of 1.00 revolutions per 8.00s? Assume it is a solid cylinder.


Homework Equations


\DeltaKE=Wnet=1/2(Iw2)=14211.7J
\tau=(\Deltaw/\Deltat)


The Attempt at a Solution

I tryed to get the answer by finding net torque first, but i didnt think i could find the net torque because i don't have the time that the merry go round goes from zero to w=.785rad/s.Then i just used the change in kinetic energy equation to get 14211.7J could i have found this answer the other way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pb23me said:
\DeltaKE=Wnet=1/2(Iw2)=14211.7J
\tau=(\Deltaw/\color{red}{\Delta}t)
You used the wrong variable! :-p It should be Δθ, not Δt

\tau = (ΔW)/(Δθ)​

The Attempt at a Solution

I tryed to get the answer by finding net torque first, but i didnt think i could find the net torque because i don't have the time that the merry go round goes from zero to w=.785rad/s.Then i just used the change in kinetic energy equation to get 14211.7J could i have found this answer the other way?

Yes. You could use kinematics if you wanted to. (But the work-energy theorem, which you ended up using in the end, is much easier.)

If you wanted to use kinematics, use the following equations:
  • W = \tau·θ (definition of work, assuming uniform torque)
  • \tau = (Newton's second law in angular terms)
  • ωf2 - ωi2 = 2αθ (one of your angular kinematics equations).
Combine the equations and solve for W. :smile: (Hint: if you keep everything in terms of variables, and solve for W before substituting in specific numbers, you'll get a pleasing result! :wink:)
 
thank you:smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K