A 3rd method of finding wavelength in a double slit

  • Thread starter LionLieOn
  • Start date
  • #1
45
0

Homework Statement



Upon using Thomas young’s double slit experiment to obtain measurements, the following data were obtain. Use these data to determine the wavelength of light being used to create the interference pattern. Do this in three different ways (6)
• the angle to the eighth maximum is 1.12◦
• the distance from the slit to the screen is 302cm
• the distance from the first minimum to the fifth minimum is 2.95cm
• the distance between the slit is 0.00025cm


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I found 2 ways of finding the wavelength using the formulas

Change in x = L (Lambda) / d

and

m(Lambda)= (d)(sin Theta subscript m)

For my third method i thought about using the formula

m(Lambda)= (d)xm/ L

the problem is I was not given xm sincexm is the distance from a point on a antinodal line to the right bisector.

However, I was told by my friend that since the 8th antinodal is provided and that "change in x" is easily obtainable, xmcan be found by just multiplying the 2 together.

which would look like

change in x = 0.007375 (Converted to Meters from cm)
8th antinodal = 8

0.007375(8) = 0.059

therefore
xm= 0.059 meters

Is my friend right?
 

Attachments

  • Attempt46.jpg
    Attempt46.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 420
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
35,513
11,972
Please define the variables you use. L, ##\lambda## and d are clear, what is everything else?

What is 0.059 meters? Certainly not the wavelength.

The third method has to be very similar to one of the other two methods, you don't have enough given values for three completely independent methods. Distance between slits and distance to the screen alone doesn't tell you anything about the wavelength, the given angle leads to one method, the given separation between minima leads to the second method.
 
  • #3
45
0
Please define the variables you use. L, ##\lambda## and d are clear, what is everything else?

What is 0.059 meters? Certainly not the wavelength.

The third method has to be very similar to one of the other two methods, you don't have enough given values for three completely independent methods. Distance between slits and distance to the screen alone doesn't tell you anything about the wavelength, the given angle leads to one method, the given separation between minima leads to the second method.


Sorry, I was in a rush and I thought I attached my work when I posted. My work should be in the attachments now.
 
  • #4
35,513
11,972
Method 2 and 3 are nearly identical, they just differ by a factor 8 in both numerator and denominator.
 
  • #5
45
0
Method 2 and 3 are nearly identical, they just differ by a factor 8 in both numerator and denominator.

should I use a different one ?
 
  • #6
35,513
11,972
See post #2: No matter what you do, two methods will look very similar. I guess the shown "third method" is as good as it gets.
 
  • #7
45
0
See post #2: No matter what you do, two methods will look very similar. I guess the shown "third method" is as good as it gets.

Ahh ok.

Thank you so much for reviewing my work! I really appreciate it.
 

Related Threads on A 3rd method of finding wavelength in a double slit

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
238
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
253
Replies
1
Views
351
Top