A block and a disk connected by a rope

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Disk Rope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a block and a disk connected by a rope, analyzed within the context of gravitational forces, friction, and rotational dynamics. Participants are exploring the relationships between linear and angular motion, as well as energy transformations in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the potential energy changes and the kinetic energy of the rotating cylinder. There are questions regarding the correct formulation of energy equations and the implications of different sign conventions. The relationship between the movements of the block and the disk is also being discussed.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the equations and assumptions involved in the problem. Some participants are seeking clarification on the definitions of variables and the implications of their chosen coordinate systems. The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being considered, particularly regarding the signs in the potential energy equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods they can employ. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in variable definitions and the relationships between different components of the system.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
All below
1592241170219.png

Basically, there is a gravitational field g and a friction force acting on the cylinder, which does not slip in the plane.
The question is, the acceleration of m'.
I solve this question basically by this:

" m*g*dh*sina + m'*g*dh = m*v1*dv1 + m'*v2*dv2 + I*w1*dw1 " {1}
w*r = v1' + v2'

So
1592241336010.png

The problem is, in {1} i suppose Δ U = - Δ T, until here okay, but i needed to say that:
Δ U = -(m*g*dh*sina + m'*g*dh)

I am trying to see why this is right.

Why not -(m*g*dh*sina) + (m'*g*dh) or +(m*g*dh*sina) - (m'*g*dh)
?

Maybe doing by the other ways, i would eliminate by absurds, or the first way already encompasses the case where one go up and another go down?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

What do you do with the kinetic energy of the rotation of the cylinder ?

Also: what do your symbols (other than the ones in the picture) represent
 
BvU said:
Hi,

What do you do with the kinetic energy of the rotation of the cylinder ?

Also: what do your symbols (other than the ones in the picture) represent
Well, dh is the distance traveled by the block hanging
v one is the velocity of the sphere
v two is the velocity of the block
I is the moment of inertia passing through the center of the sphere
w is the angular velocity

And using the fact that w1*r need to be equal to -v1, just substituting in the equation
 
LCSphysicist said:
m*g*dh*sina + m'*g*dh
If m' descends dh, how far up the slope as m move?
LCSphysicist said:
w*r = v1' + v2'
Same question, and check those signs.
 
haruspex said:
If m' descends dh, how far up the slope as m move?

Same question, and check those signs.
Actually the second notation that you quote is a vector notation XD are the constraint that i found.

Lo = x2 + x1 - Theta*r

" If m' descends dh, how far up the slope as m move?"
I thought it far up dh too, but, it fall by R theta later, since it is routing. That is, as result:

-dh + dtheta*r (i adopt positive down the slope.)

Exact as it previous Lo = x2 + x1 - Theta*r
dLo = 0 = dh + x - dtheta*r
x = dtheta*r - dh

The problem is yet the signal in the potential equation :C
 
LCSphysicist said:
Actually the second notation that you quote is a vector notation XD are the constraint that i found.
Lo = x2 + x1 - Theta*r
I assume x1 and x2 are movements by m (i.e. the mass centre of the cylinder) and m' respectively.
That cannot make sense as a vector equation since the constraint is imposed by the string, and the string changes direction between the two. Clearly these are just distances.
LCSphysicist said:
i adopt positive down the slope
And down positive for the block too? Ok, that explains x1+x2.
It looks like you are taking clockwise as the positive direction for theta, right?
Lo, I take it, is the string length.
(It would save a lot of back and forth if you were to define all your variables in the first place.)

Since it is rolling contact, what is the relationship between theta and x1?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
18K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K