Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A calculus of variations question

  1. Dec 16, 2006 #1
    I am trying to learn the calculus of variations, and I understand the mathematical derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation.

    As I understand it, the calculus of variations seeks to find extrema for functions of the form:
    [tex]S[q,\dot{q}, x] = \int_{a}^{b} L(q(x),\dot{q}(x), x) \,dx[/tex].

    Here is my question: Why is it necessary to have [itex]\dot{q}[/itex] as an argument of [itex]L[/itex]? Isn't the derivative of the function [itex]q[/itex] "included" with the function itself?

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 16, 2006 #2

    AKG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    L is a function of three variables L(z,y,x) where we consider the cases where z = q(x), y = q'(x). Now when we write L(z,y,x), then it makes sense to consider (dL/dy)(z,y,x). If we consider L a function of two variables, writing L(z,x), then how can we make sense of the derivative of L with respect to (dz/dx)(x)? So although the second argument of L ends up being the derivative of the first argument w.r.t. the third (and so, seems to already be "contained" in the other arguments), if we want to do things like take the partial of L with respect to q'(x), we need to have q'(x) occupy its own argument.
     
  4. Dec 16, 2006 #3
    Thanks for the explanation - I understand now.

    I suppose this is something peculiar to functionals, but it's simple enough.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: A calculus of variations question
Loading...