A car is slowing down at a constant pace

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avathacis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Constant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A car is slowing down at a constant rate, and the problem involves calculating the total stopping time based on the distance traveled in the first half of the stopping distance. Given that the car takes t1=4 seconds to travel half of its stopping distance, the total stopping time (t2) can be derived using kinematic equations. The relationship established is that S1 equals S2, leading to the equation t2^2 - 4t2t1 + t1^2 = 0, which is critical for solving the problem accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of distance, speed, and acceleration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Knowledge of the significance of time in motion equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations in physics
  • Learn how to apply the quadratic formula to solve equations
  • Explore the concept of acceleration and its impact on motion
  • Practice problems involving constant acceleration and deceleration scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and motion, as well as educators looking for examples of kinematic applications in real-world scenarios.

Avathacis
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
A car is slowing down at a constant rate...

Homework Statement


WARNING: This is a translation. If you find something you can't understand, i'll try to explain.
A car is slowing down at a constant rate. The car travels half of its stopping distance in t1=4s. How long does the car take to stop?

Homework Equations


t1=4s
S1=S2

S1 - first part of the path
S2 - second part of the path
v0 - starting speed
v1 - speed after the first half of the path
t2 - whole time spent traveling
x0 - starting position (0?)

The Attempt at a Solution


Err:
v=v0t?+at?2 (i'm guessing that v=0?)
v0=at?
v1=a(t2-t1) (?)

So what i am guessing is that i should make
S1=x0+v0t?+at?2/2
S2=x0+v1(t2-t1)+a(t2-t1)2/2

and then put in the v0 and v1 i got earlier. And then since S1=S2 i put what i got from the above.. I think the a's should get removed if i divide by "a" and i should get a quadratic equation. Here's the problem, I've tried doing it (filled around 3 pages of my notes) and i get the wrong answer. Which, i think, is mainly due to the fact i don't know what times to put in where. The answer should be:
t22-4t2t1+t12=0

And i get always something around that ^. But never it. Sometimes I'm missing just 1 number, sometimes a letter. What to do? :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Avathacis! :smile:
Avathacis said:
A car is slowing down at a constant pace. Half of it's stopping path (i'm not sure what do you call it in english) the car travels in t1=4s. In how much time since the stopping started the car stops?

v=v0t?+at?2 (i'm guessing that v=0?)
v0=at?
v1=a(t2-t1) (?) …

("A car is slowing down at a constant rate. The car travels half of its stopping distance in t1=4s. How long does the car take to stop?" :wink:)

Hint: find v1 by using a formula which doesn't involve t. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Avathacis! :smile:


("A car is slowing down at a constant rate. The car travels half of its stopping distance in t1=4s. How long does the car take to stop?" :wink:)

Hint: find v1 by using a formula which doesn't involve t. :smile:

<br /> v^2 = v_1^2 + 2 a \Delta x?<br />
I don't think I'm supposed to know this formula :>. Or at least i haven't used it. Or I'm not getting something?
Also thanks for the fixes.

Wouldn't that make (assuming i am correct about v being 0)
<br /> v_1 = root - 2 a S<br /> Also i assume that delta x is S in my problem? :>

Also could anyone tell me if my guesses are correct and why it would be great :>.
 
Last edited:
Avathacis said:
<br /> v^2 = v_1^2 + 2 a \Delta x?<br />
I don't think I'm supposed to know this formula :>. Or at least i haven't used it. Or I'm not getting something?
You don't need that formula. Just use your equations for distance for each half of the distance.

Hint: Express both V1 and V0 in terms of a, T1, T2. (Careful with signs.)
 
Doc Al said:
You don't need that formula. Just use your equations for distance for each half of the distance.

Hint: Express both V1 and V0 in terms of a, T1, T2. (Careful with signs.)

v0=at1 (?)
v1=a(t2-t1)
 
Avathacis said:
v0=at1 (?)
This one is not quite right. V0 goes to 0 in time T2.
v1=a(t2-t1)
Good.

Note that here you are using 'a' to represent the magnitude of the acceleration. I suggest that you revise your earlier equations to use the same convention.
 
Doc Al said:
This one is not quite right. V0 goes to 0 in time T2.

Good.

Note that here you are using 'a' to represent the magnitude of the acceleration. I suggest that you revise your earlier equations to use the same convention.
1) I'm supposed to use the time the speed gets down to 0? It'll be helpful!

Though I'm not sure i get what you mean by magnitude :<.
 
Avathacis said:
1) I'm supposed to use the time the speed gets down to 0? It'll be helpful!
Sure. That time is what you call T2--the total time.
Though I'm not sure i get what you mean by magnitude
Magnitude means the quantity without regard for its sign. For example: The magnitude of the number -11 is just 11.

So if you call the magnitude of the acceleration 'a', then the actual acceleration will be -a, since it's slowing down. For example:

Vf = V0 - at

Applying that to the final speed, we get:
0 = V0 - at2
or
V0 = at2
 
Doc Al said:
Sure. That time is what you call T2--the total time.

Magnitude means the quantity without regard for its sign. For example: The magnitude of the number -11 is just 11.

So if you call the magnitude of the acceleration 'a', then the actual acceleration will be -a, since it's slowing down. For example:

Vf = V0 - at

Applying that to the final speed, we get:
0 = V0 - at2
or
V0 = at2
Kinda like modules? (|-11|=11?)
I guess you're kinda turning to the point that I'm making a + or - mistake somewhere right?
 
  • #10
Avathacis said:
Kinda like modules? (|-11|=11?)
Exactly like that.
I guess you're kinda turning to the point that I'm making a + or - mistake somewhere right?
It's hard to tell. Why don't you write down your four equations, using 'a' as the modulus of the acceleration. (Thus, you may have to put '-a' in some of your formulas.) You'll have your two distance equations and the two velocity equations.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Exactly like that.

It's hard to tell. Why don't you write down your four equations, using 'a' as the modulus of the acceleration. (Thus, you may have to put '-a' in some of your formulas.) You'll have your two distance equations and the two velocity equations.
<br /> S_1 = x_0 + v_0t_2 + at_2^2/2<br />

<br /> S_2 = x_0 + v_1(t_2 - t_1) + a(t_2 - t_1)^2/2<br />

<br /> v_0 = at_2<br />

<br /> v_1 = a(t_2 - t_1)<br />

Right, i know i have to put in the v_0 and V_1 into S_1 and S_2.
 
  • #12
Avathacis said:
<br /> S_1 = x_0 + v_0t_2 + at_2^2/2<br />
Since S1 is the first part of the distance, shouldn't the time be t1, not t2?

<br /> S_2 = x_0 + v_1(t_2 - t_1) + a(t_2 - t_1)^2/2<br />
Since the car is slowing down, you need to replace 'a' with '-a' in both of those equations.

<br /> v_0 = at_2<br />

<br /> v_1 = a(t_2 - t_1)<br />
OK.

Right, i know i have to put in the v_0 and V_1 into S_1 and S_2.
Yes, then set S1 = S2.
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
Since S1 is the first part of the distance, shouldn't the time be t1, not t2?


Since the car is slowing down, you need to replace 'a' with '-a' in both of those equations.


OK.


Yes, then set S1 = S2.
I think i can solve it now. Well explained, thanks. I will post again if i need more help :>.
 
  • #14
I have a quick question:
After solving the equation a little i get:
t2=2t2t1+t2t1sqrt2
Can i divide by t2 to remove it?
 
  • #15
Avathacis said:
I have a quick question:
After solving the equation a little i get:
t2=2t2t1+t2t1sqrt2
Can i divide by t2 to remove it?
Algebraically, sure you can. But that equation cannot be correct. (You cannot have a physically meaningful equation where terms have different units. You can't have a time term equal to a time-squared term.)

So go over it again carefully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K