A Career in Engineering Analysis vs Design

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the career paths in engineering, specifically comparing roles in design versus analysis, such as finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Participants explore the implications of choosing one path over the other, particularly in the aerospace and power industries, and the potential for skill transferability between these roles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks insights on whether pursuing a career in design or analysis would limit future opportunities in the other area.
  • Another participant notes that in aerospace, design and analysis roles often overlap, with the same engineers performing both tasks, although larger projects may have distinct teams for each function.
  • A participant mentions that their company separates design and analysis roles, suggesting variability in industry practices.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for software development to integrate analysis more seamlessly into the design process.
  • One participant expresses a desire to engage in both design and analysis, indicating that preferences may vary by company size.
  • Concerns are raised about the portability of skills between industries, particularly whether principles learned in aerospace design can be applied elsewhere.
  • A later reply suggests that further education may focus more on analysis, potentially leading to specialization in larger companies.
  • It is mentioned that smaller companies may require engineers to handle both design and basic analysis tasks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the separation of design and analysis roles, with some suggesting significant overlap in aerospace while others indicate a clear division in their experiences. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these choices on career flexibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that experiences may vary significantly between different companies and industries, and there are indications that educational paths may influence career trajectories in design versus analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career in engineering, particularly in design or analysis roles, as well as those interested in the aerospace and power industries.

koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I was hoping to get some perspective from practicing engineers on the difference of a career in design making stuff, or analysis ( performing FEA, CFD etc on designs). I am in a rotational program and have some flexiblity. I ask because it appears these are divergent choices and going down one path will close the door on the other. Any opinions would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I personally haven't seen a difference career wise if you are in aerospace. For example as part of a design that modifies an aircraft structure the models built for the design are used to perform FAE on the structural, thermal, etc impacts of the change. Those results are rolled into design changes/improvements. But the same engineers doing the design are the same ones doing the analysis.

That being said I do not have experience with massive development projects like designing a complete aircraft. In that case there very well be a group that just does modeling/analysis being fed data by the design group.

So I guess my summary is that if you are a mechanical or aerospace engineer I would expect you to have experience with FEA/CFD analysis regardless if you are a design engineer or if you end up doing strictly modeling/analysis. I don't know if the career fields are segmented so that there is really a hard distinction in industry.
 
Ok, that is good to know. I would think that a design engineer would need to do both but in my company it appears to be separate. I have been reading of software developers trying to make the analysis process easier so it can be folded into the design process more. I personally would like to have my hand in both pots but it appears that is a company to company difference. I may need to go to a smaller operation.

Do you think on skill is more portable than the other? Once you design an Aerospace part can those principles be used to design something else in a different industry more or less. I feel analysis is analysis which is the direction i am leaning. I am in the power industry by i may want to switch in the future and would prefer something that keeps my options open.
 
If you stay in school after your bachelors, you'll get classes geared more towards analysis rather than actual design.

I think the smaller the company you work for, the more you'll be expected to design and carry out the rudimentary FE analyses. If you choose to work at a large company there is a real possibility that you'll be pigeonholed into one or the other. It's rare to meet a good design engineer who also has graduate level FEA theory under his belt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K