A charge q approaching two stationary charges q1 and q2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy in the context of a charge \( q \) approaching two stationary charges \( q_1 \) and \( q_2 \). Participants explore the setup of the energy equation and the assumptions regarding potential energy at a distance from the charges.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumptions needed to set up the conservation of energy equation, particularly regarding the initial conditions of velocity and potential energy. There is a focus on whether potential energy can be considered zero at a distance described as "far enough."

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the implications of the problem's wording and the assumptions about potential energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of "far from each other" and its relation to potential energy being zero.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing debates about the definitions of distance and the implications for potential energy, particularly in cases where the charges are nearly equal in magnitude. The lack of explicit definitions in the problem statement has led to varied interpretations among participants.

Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
Homework Statement
Two charges ##-q_1## and ##+q_2## are stationed at a distance ##l##. A particle of mass ##m## and charge ##q## is approaching the 2 charges along the flat plane which passes through them (photo). What's the minimum velocity the particle must have so that it makes it to the charge ##-q_1##?
Relevant Equations
##\Delta E = 0##
I'm only confused about one part of this problem and that is setting up the conservation of energy equation. In the solution, they just wrote this: $$\frac{mv_o^2}{2} = - k \frac{q_1 q}{r} + k \frac{q_2 q}{l + r}$$ where ##r## represents the distance at which the force created by the negative charge is equal to the force created by the positive charge (assuming that ##\mid q_1\mid < \mid q_2\mid##). Now, I tried doing this my way and I ran into some issues. $$\Delta E = 0 \implies \Delta K + \Delta U = 0$$ Now, this is the part that confuses me. To get the equation from above I have to assume that the magnitude of velocity and distance ##r## is equal to 0 and that the potential energy at some initial point is 0. Is that true? I mean, for the velocity, sure, it could be that the particle isn't fully in an equilibrium so I guess we can assume that the velocity at the distance ##r## can be 0 because even slightest movement could cause the particle to move. Now for the potential energy, does it assume here that the particle is at infinity because how could the potential energy be 0 unless the particle is at infinity?
From this we get, $$(0 - \frac{mv_o^2}{2}) + (-k\frac{q_1 q}{r} + k \frac{q_2 q}{l + r} - 0) = 0 \implies \frac{mv_o^2}{2} = - k \frac{q_1 q}{r} + k \frac{q_2 q}{l + r}$$ Is this it?
1720737509007.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly the velocity required is less the closer the point at which it starts with that velocity. Therefore the question ought to have stated that it starts from a distance >> l.
 
haruspex said:
Clearly the velocity required is less the closer the point at which it starts with that velocity. Therefore the question ought to have stated that it starts from a distance >> l.
Well, it doesn't explicitly say that. It just says that they start far from each other.
 
Heisenberg7 said:
Well, it doesn't explicitly say that. It just says that they start far from each other.
It is the same thing.

"Far from each other" is taken to mean "far enough so that you don't have to worry about how far".
 
jbriggs444 said:
It is the same thing.

"Far from each other" is taken to mean "far enough so that you don't have to worry about how far".
So, does that mean that we can assume that the potential energy at that "far enough" is 0?
 
Heisenberg7 said:
So, does that mean that we can assume that the potential energy at that "far enough" is 0?
Yes. If told that ##q## is 'far away' (or words to that effect) from all other charges, it is implied that ##q##'s potential energy can be taken to be zero. It's fairly common terminology.

A minor point...

In an extreme case where ##|q_1|## and ##|q_2|## are nearly equal (with ##|q_2| \gt |q_1|##) and where ##l## is very small, then ##r## could be very large.

So maybe it's preferable to say that ##q## needs to start from a distance ##\gg r##, rather than from a distance ##\gg l##. But 'far way' is simpler terminology.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heisenberg7
Heisenberg7 said:
To get the equation from above I have to assume that the magnitude of velocity and distance ##r## is equal to 0
at distance ##r##* For some reason, I can't edit the post.
 
Heisenberg7 said:
So, does that mean that we can assume that the potential energy at that "far enough" is 0?
I would quibble a bit about that.

Potential energy is always relative to some arbitrary reference level. Only potential differences are physically meaningful.

I do agree that if you are taking zero potential to be "at infinity" then yes, we can assume that "far enough" is potential energy [insignificantly different from] zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K