A confusion about the conception of work

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Entanglement
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of work in physics, particularly in relation to scenarios where force is applied without resulting in displacement, such as pushing a wall or holding a heavy bag of bricks. Participants explore the implications of the work-energy principle and the distinction between physical exertion and mechanical work.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the definition of work, noting that despite physical exertion (e.g., sweating, fatigue), no work is done on objects like a brick wall or a heavy bag of bricks when there is no displacement.
  • One participant clarifies that while mechanical work on stationary objects is zero, energy is still expended by the body, which is converted to heat rather than work on the object.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of efficiency, stating that the human body is inefficient at exerting static forces, leading to energy waste without work being done.
  • Some participants draw parallels to objects in circular motion, suggesting that similar principles apply where energy is expended without work being done on the object.
  • A participant uses an analogy of cleaning a floor to illustrate that physical labor does not always equate to work in the mechanical sense, emphasizing the distinction between effort and measurable work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that while energy is expended during physical exertion, it does not translate into mechanical work when there is no displacement. However, there is ongoing discussion regarding the implications of this understanding and the efficiency of human exertion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in understanding the relationship between force, displacement, and energy expenditure, particularly in static scenarios. There is also a dependence on definitions of work and efficiency that may not be universally agreed upon.

Entanglement
Messages
438
Reaction score
13
I've learned that a force is said to do work when it acts on a body and causes a displacement in the same direction of the force and that W = F.s ( when theta equals zero)
But I have a problem understanding the concept. On Pushing a brick wall, carrying a bag heavy brick at a constant height, it is said that zero work is done, according to W = F.s Cos theta, these previous examples can be explained, but equations are not everything about physics, I have a hard time to believe that one can spend hours pushing a wall, he sweats, his face becomes red and he eventually falls unconscious, but after all of that it is said that the work done is Zero because s = zero.

I'm not saying W = F.s isn't correct, I'm just saying that there's is something I'm missing causing this misunderstanding, So I would like some clarification, thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ElmorshedyDr said:
I've learned that a force is said to do work when it acts on a body and causes a displacement in the same direction of the force and that W = F.s ( when theta equals zero)

But I have a problem understanding the concept. On Pushing a brick wall, carrying a bag heavy brick at a constant height, it is said that zero work is done, according to W = F.s Cos theta, these previous examples can be explained, but equations are not everything about physics, I have hard time to believe that one can spend hours push a wall, he sweats, his face becomes red and he eventually falls unconscious, but the work done is Zero because s = zero.
I'm not saying W = F.s is 100% correct, I'm just saying that there's is something I'm missing causing this misunderstanding, So I would like some clarification, thanks in advance.
The mechanical work done on the stationary brick wall is zero. You have transferred no energy to the wall. Same for holding the heavy bag of bricks at a fixed height.

Of course, internally your muscles are expending energy, tensing and relaxing to maintain that muscular tension. But none of that energy goes into the wall or the bag of bricks. You could get the same effect by leaning something against the wall or by placing the bag of bricks on a table. The fact that we have to expend energy just to go nowhere does not change the fact that no work is done on the wall or bag.
 
You are missing efficiency. A human body is very inefficient at exerting static forces, to be precise, the efficiency is 0%. Energy is used, but no work is done and all of the energy used goes to waste heat.

We can devise idealized machines that do the same thing (carrying bags, pushing walls) without using any energy, and we can make real machines that are pretty close to those ideal machines.
 
What DocAl said...

The only thing I will add is that our bodies are very inefficient machines, and especially inefficient at maintaining constant forces. You are right that a human will rapidly become tired holding a heavy bag of bricks at a constant height... But a steel table can support a heavy bag of bricks pretty much forever without any energy input and without ever getting tired or otherwise weakening.
 
ElmorshedyDr said:
I have hard time to believe that one can spend hours push a wall, he sweats, his face becomes red and he eventually falls unconscious, but the work done is Zero because s = zero.

In this situation, we do indeed expend energy, but it doesn't go into work done on the brick or wall. It ends up as thermal energy. We become not only sweaty and tired, we become hot (or at least a bit warmer).

[Added: I see now that this simply repeats DaleSpam's comments in different words.]
 
Is the same thing with Objects in circular motion?
 
ElmorshedyDr said:
Is the same thing with Objects in circular motion?

Pretty much, yes. You can easily exhaust yourself swinging a weight on the end of a string... But a wheel doesn't get tired and if it weren't for friction would spin forever without doing any work or needing any energy input.
 
Here's how I think of it:
When work is done, the guy must leave the wall in a different way than he has found it, otherwise he has done nothing. When he leaves, the wall is still exactly the same as when he found it.

If you worked at McDonald's and cleaned the same 1 sq foot section of the floor all day long, you may be very, very tired from scrubbing the ground for 10 hours, and you'll have done hard physical labor, but your manager will think you haven't done much work, and you'll be fired.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
986
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K