A curve that intersects itself at some point w/o trig functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of functions, particularly in relation to curves that intersect themselves, such as those described by parametric equations. Participants explore the implications of the vertical line test, the characteristics of specific equations, and the conditions under which a curve may or may not be considered a function. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and examples, with a focus on non-trigonometric representations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a curve containing a loop cannot be a function because it fails the vertical line test, which requires that each x-value corresponds to only one y-value.
  • Others argue that the vertical line test can be applied to parametric equations, but the determination of whether the combined equation is a function may depend on the specific form of the equations involved.
  • One participant questions how to ascertain if a set of parametric equations will pass the vertical line test, suggesting that it may only be possible by examining the combined function.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of functions, with some participants noting that traditional definitions may not encompass all types of mappings or relations, leading to confusion regarding what constitutes a function.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about whether a curve that creates a loop can be described by an equation that does not involve trigonometric functions.
  • One participant clarifies that the equation of a circle does not represent a function due to the existence of multiple y-values for a single x-value, emphasizing the distinction between relations and functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions of functions and the implications of the vertical line test. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of curves that intersect themselves and whether they can be expressed as functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying interpretations of the definitions of functions and mappings, leading to potential misunderstandings. The discussion also highlights the complexity of determining whether certain equations can be classified as functions based on their graphical representations.

Lebombo
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
In order for an equation to be a function, it has to pass the vertical line test.

A circle is not a function because it does not pass the vertical line test.

A curve containing a loop does not pass the vertical line test and to me that means it is not a function.

However, if I am given two parametric equations, x(t) and y(t) that both seem to be functions (passing the vertical line test), and am provided a picture of the graph of the parametric equations, if the curve of the parametric equations contains a loop, I would assume right away that the combined equation, y(x), can not be a function because the graph has a loop.


So if I have x(t) = t^{5} + 4t^{3} and y(t) = t^{2}

And because x(t) is not solvable, I can't sub the t(x) into y(t), but I can sub t(y) into x(t):

x(y) = ((+/-)y^{5/2}- 4(+/-)y^{3/2}

x= y^{5/2}- 4y^{3/2} or x= -y^{5/2}+ 4y^{3/2}


My question is here:

Is there anything specific about this function or a function of similar form that enables me to see that A) it is not a function B) It creates a loop when graphed (implying there is at least some point at which the curve intersects itself)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The vertical line test you mentioned simply means finding out whether there is a single x that gives two different ys or not.You can figure that out by some calculation too.
Consider the equation of a circle: x^2+y^2=R^2. I can write y=\pm \sqrt{R^2-x^2}. It is obvious that there exits some x that give two different ys. In fact all x gives two different ys except x=R. So from the equation of a circle,you can get a function!
 
Shyan,


So when given the parametric equations:

x(t) = t^{5} + 4t^{3} and t^{2}

At what point can I determine the equation will or will not pass the vertical line test (be or not be a function)?


Question 1) Can I tell by looking at the set of parametric equations given, or can I only tell by looking at the combined x(y) function?

Question 2) If x(t) can not be solved in terms of t(x), then how can x(y) be solved in terms of y(x)?

That is, are you saying that it is possible to isolate y to one side in this(these) equation(s)?

x(y) = ((+/-)y^{5/2}- 4(+/-)y^{3/2}

x= y^{5/2}- 4y^{3/2} or x= -y^{5/2}+ 4y^{3/2}


I believe I just learned that a function of this particular form can not be solved for the independent variable, so it doesn't seem to follow the example with the circle you provided, due to being a 5th degree polynomial, unless I'm neglecting some other facts that I'm not yet aware of.
 
This you may consider pedantic but you wait till you see the guys who come next.

At least in my time a function is not what you think - what you think used to be called a "single-valued function". A function in my day was just a rule, give x calculate something, not necessarily only one thing, called f(x), by the rule. And yes, the most usual, useful ones tended to be single valued, and you tended to think they are all like that. But even when you defined them to be like that, their inverses often aren't.

Functions have tended to be replaced by "mappings" which I think is almost the same thing (:rolleyes: we'll soon hear :biggrin:) and which may have been more evocative if I hadn't got used to functions, that maybe emphasizes more calculation.
 
Last edited:
epenguin,

I think I kind of understand what you mean. I don't consider an equation a function if one x produces more than one y's.



Suppose I have a curve that creates a loop. The equation that describes that curve is not considered a function because of the rule that one x must produce one y.

However, can a curve of this type be described by some sort of equation? That is, an equation which does not include trig functions?
 
Lebombo said:
Suppose I have a curve that creates a loop. The equation that describes that curve is not considered a function because of the rule that one x must produce one y.

However, can a curve of this type be described by some sort of equation? That is, an equation which does not include trig functions?

Did you read post #2 in this thread?
 
Shyan said:
The vertical line test you mentioned simply means finding out whether there is a single x that gives two different ys or not.You can figure that out by some calculation too.
Consider the equation of a circle: x^2+y^2=R^2. I can write y=\pm \sqrt{R^2-x^2}. It is obvious that there exits some x that give two different ys. In fact all x gives two different ys except x=R. So from the equation of a circle,you can get a function!


But I thought y=\pm \sqrt{R^2-x^2} is not a function exactly because one x value gives two different y values. I thought it can't be a function unless you write it expressly as two different equations, at which point there are now two separate functions.
 
I think Lebombo has problem with my post because of the following line:
So from the equation of a circle,you can get a function!
It was just a miss-typing.In fact I meant:
So from the equation of a circle,you can't get a function!
Going with the definitions,I can say there can exist a relation between the members of two sets(which can be the same). If the relation gets one member of the input set and gives one member of the output set,it is called a binary relation. If this binary relation, relates each member of the input set to only one member of the output set, it is called a function. If this function relates each member of the output set to only one member of the input set,it is called a one to one function. If for every member of the output set,there exists a member of the input set which is related to it by our function,our function is called an onto or Surjective function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K