A Different Definition of Derivative

[Unassuming]

Homework Statement

part 1. )

If f:(a,b)--> R is differentiable at p in (a,b), prove that

f ' (p) = lim (n -> oo) n [ f(p + 1/n) - f(p) ].

part 2. )

Show by example that the existence of the limit of the sequence,

{n [ f(p + 1/n) - f(p) ] } does not imply the existence of f ' (p).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

One failed attempt involved comparing this limit to the definition below,

$$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(p_n)-f(p)}{p_n-p}$$.

I attempted to break the new definition (up top) into the sum of the limits and proceed down that path but it did not lead to anything.

I have also tried this new definition with a functions and a point and compared its result to f'(p) to gain some understanding. I still cannot seem to get anywhere though.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

 

[Dick]

That sequence looks EXACTLY like your definition where p_n=p+1/n. What's the problem?

 

[Unassuming]

I see how this works for the sequence p_n= p + 1/n. Do we not have to show that the two are equivalent for all sequences that converge to p, and/or is that what we are doing?

 

[Dick]

If the function is differentiable at p then all such sequences converge to the derivative. For the second part they want to find a function that is NOT differentiable at p, but where the limit of that particular sequence does exist.