B A doubt about tangential and normal aceleration, pilot g forces

AI Thread Summary
In this discussion, participants explore the concepts of tangential and normal acceleration as they relate to a pilot inside a spinning tube. They analyze how varying the radius of the circle affects the g-forces experienced by the pilot, particularly when the angular velocity of the tube changes. The conversation delves into the mechanics of motion, including the implications of a pilot moving in a spiral trajectory and the necessary calculations for understanding forces in this scenario. Additionally, they discuss the complexities of motion in a frictionless, massless system and the conservation of momentum principles. Ultimately, they emphasize the importance of accurately defining motion and forces to avoid contradictions in physics problems.
  • #151
jbriggs444 said:
What is the y component of the velocity of the astronaut? (answer in terms of v and αα\alpha).
What is the y component of the velocity of the spot? (answer in terms of R and ωω\omega).
Is the y component of the velocity of the astronaut the same as the y component of the velocity of the spot? (yes or no).

vsinalpha.
wR.
yes.Edit:

Also I was wondering if your frame reference is rotating with the tube or not? I didnt understand that part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
farolero said:
vsinalpha
wR
yes
Good. Now that means that one can write:
$$v \sin \alpha = vy_{astronaut} = vy_{spot} = \omega R$$
Solving for v...
$$v = \frac{\omega R}{\sin \alpha}$$
 
Last edited:
  • #153
Yes but is it the frame reference rotating with the tube? because otherwise I am not sure the aswer to the last question is yes.

From a fixed reference the Vy of the astronaut would be Vsin alpha plus the speed of the tube at that point.
 
Last edited:
  • #154
farolero said:
Yes but is it the frame reference rotating with the tube? because otherwise I am not sure the aswer to the last question is yes.
*heavy sigh*
There is a reason that I said "stationary" when I asked you to imagine the cartesian coordinate grid.
From a fixed reference the Vy of the astronaut would be Vsin alpha plus the speed of the tube at that point.
That is not correct and does not match the answer you gave previously. You have already agreed that the Vy of the astronaut is equal to the Vy of the tube.

Unless the walls of the tube have holes in them, the two velocities must match.
 
  • #155
Ok i see you took an stationary reference i was not sure if it was stationary with the tube.

What you said seems only valid for that special position, if the tube is offset 45º from the x reference the Vy of the point is wrsen45 but the vY of the astronaut would actually be the net tangential velocity of the astronaut so Vy= Vt( supposing the trajetory of the astronaut is offset 45º from radially). And in this case the Vy of the point wouldn't be equal to the Vy of the astronaut.

So your main assumption to solve the problem though antiintuitive is not right.

Your assumption that the Vy of the point= Vy of the astronaut is only valid if you take a rotating reference with the tube, as a matter of fact you did so putting the x axe along the tube
 
Last edited:
  • #156
farolero said:
Ok i see you took an stationary reference i was not sure if it was stationary with the tube.

What you said seems only valid for that special position, if the tube is offset 45º from the x reference the Vy of the point is wrsen45 but the vY of the astronaut would actually be the net tangential velocity of the astronaut so Vy= Vt( supposing the trajetory of the astronaut is offset 45º from radially). And in this case the Vy of the point wouldn't be equal to the Vy of the astronaut.
That is not correct. If the tube is offset by 45 degrees, then you just unstick the coordinate grid from the wall, rotate it by 45 degrees and stick it back down again.

Or you can do the analytical geometry to demonstrate that it works even if you do not unstick the grid.

Your basic problem is your unwavering conviction that you are right. Please review Mark Twain's admonition. You are so far wrong that it is not even entertaining.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #157
jbriggs444 said:
That is not correct. If the tube is offset by 45 degrees, then you just unstick the coordinate grid from the wall, rotate it by 45 degrees and stick it back down again.

Then if you unstick and stick the x axe along the tube youre taking a rotational frame with the tube.

Ill demonstrate how the Vy of the point is not the Vy of the astronaut analitically:

When the tube has an angle of 45º with the x reference you stop it with an exterior torque, so the w is zero, then Vy of the spot=0 but Vy of the astronaut doesn't equal zero, so Vy of the astronaut is not equal to Vy of the spot bringing down your original assumption

I think mark twain quote is more appropiate for the teacher than for the student.
 
  • #158
I think it's high time to close this thread.

@farolero: Please review the entire thread, paying close attention to jbriggs444's very patient explanations.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and Greg Bernhardt
Back
Top