B Zero acceleration = zero net force?

Click For Summary
A truck moving at constant velocity has zero acceleration, indicating that the net force acting on it is also zero. The gravitational force and normal force balance each other, while the applied force equals the total frictional forces opposing motion, preventing acceleration. The discussion highlights that the applied force, often attributed to the engine, is actually a frictional force between the tires and the road, which propels the truck forward. When the truck is in motion, any unbalanced force is only needed to counteract friction, not to accelerate the truck further. Ultimately, the concept of motion is relative, and understanding the forces at play clarifies how objects maintain constant velocity.
  • #31
sophiecentaur said:
It's the same with Work By and Work Done. It's just Work with a sign which depends on your measurement frame.
The sign of work doesn't just depend on the reference frame, but also on whether the value represents work done by A on B, or by B on A. These are two completely different issues, that can affect the sign of work.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy, berkeman, jbriggs444 and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
A.T. said:
These are two completely different issues
Maybe but they are both viewed in an intuitive way.
A.T. said:
but also on whether the value represents work done by A on B, or by B on A.
It's only by knowing the displacement and the force that you can decide what's on what. In a scenario of say two jet engines pushing against each other you can pass through the condition where the net FTD changes sign. Or are you saying that the frame of reference is involved? Perhaps if you made your statement in a different way, I'd understand what your are saying.
 
  • #33
sophiecentaur said:
Maybe but they are both viewed in an intuitive way.
That is no reason to conflate them.
sophiecentaur said:
It's only by knowing the displacement and the force that you can decide what's on what.
Yes, from these two you can compute work.
sophiecentaur said:
Perhaps if you made your statement in a different way, I'd understand what your are saying.
This has been explained to you so many times in previous threads. Just reread them instead of hijacking another one.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy, berkeman, SammyS and 1 other person
  • #34
This thread has run its course, and after some editing it has been closed. Thanks to all who tried to offer clear explanations.
 
  • Like
Likes paulb203 and jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
982
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K