A doubt on Thomson's Experiments to determine the value of e / m_e

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Thomson's experiments successfully measured the deflections of electrons in electric and magnetic fields, leading to the determination of the charge-to-mass ratio (e/me) as 1.75 x 10^11 C kg^-1. The discussion clarifies that the measurements pertain to specific electric and magnetic field strengths and emphasizes the importance of context when interpreting the results. Misinterpretations may arise if the deduced ratio is confused with the ratio of electric field strength to magnetic field strength (|E|/|B|). The conversation highlights the need for precise references when quoting scientific data to avoid communication errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thomson's experiments in physics
  • Knowledge of electric and magnetic field concepts
  • Familiarity with charge-to-mass ratio calculations
  • Basic principles of electron deflection in fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of Thomson's experiments and their significance in physics
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the charge-to-mass ratio (e/me)
  • Explore the implications of electric and magnetic field strengths on particle motion
  • Learn about the differences between charge-to-mass ratio and field strength ratios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining Thomson's experiments, and researchers interested in the fundamentals of electron behavior in electric and magnetic fields.

Rishabh Narula
Messages
61
Reaction score
5
By carrying out accurate measurements
on the amount of deflections observed
by the electrons on the
electric field strength or
magnetic field strength,
Thomson was able to determine
the value of e/me as...
e/me = 1.75 10^11 C kg^-1

would this be a correct understanding of this para-
"This para
is just saying that he made measurements
on how much deflection is being caused by
particular electric and magnetic field strengths
and deduced the ratio from those"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Why don't you provide a reference when you quote litterally, so that a helper can look at the context ?
Saves everybody time and avoids communication errors !
Even if it says copyright NCERT or something (you link, you don't copy).

The context is more didactical than historic, but I see no discrepancies with your version.
Your 'and deduced the ratio' refers to e/m but can easily be mistaken for |E|/|B| by a reader

But your title mentions doubt. About what, specifically ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rishabh Narula
Rishabh Narula said:
"This para
is just saying that he made measurements
on how much deflection is being caused by
particular electric and magnetic field strengths
and deduced the ratio from those"
Remember that the observed ratio of field strengths was for a particular electron velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rishabh Narula
BvU said:
Hi,

Why don't you provide a reference when you quote litterally, so that a helper can look at the context ?
Saves everybody time and avoids communication errors !
Even if it says copyright NCERT or something (you link, you don't copy).

The context is more didactical than historic, but I see no discrepancies with your version.
Your 'and deduced the ratio' refers to e/m but can easily be mistaken for |E|/|B| by a reader

But your title mentions doubt. About what, specifically ?
sorry i mean a question
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
541
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K