A limit that doesn't work with l'Hôpital's rule

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the limit \(\lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{e^{-\frac{1}{x}}}{x}\), which is situated within the context of limits and the application of l'Hôpital's rule.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches, including taking logarithms, applying l'Hôpital's rule, and rewriting the expression. Some question the validity of using l'Hôpital's rule due to the divergence of the expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes multiple interpretations of the limit and the application of l'Hôpital's rule. Some participants suggest alternative forms of the expression, while others raise concerns about the limit's existence from different directions.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the limit potentially not existing when approaching from negative values, highlighting the importance of considering limits from both sides.

daudaudaudau
Messages
297
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate \lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{e^{-\frac{1}{x}}}{x}


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried taking logarithms and applying l'Hôpital's rule, but that just led to an expression which diverged, and as far as I understand, the limit in l'Hôpital's rule MUST exist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could also use the following hand waving argument. The numerator will go to zero much faster than the denominator will so the limit will be 0.
 
How about rewriting the original expression as
\frac{1/x}{e^{1/x}}
and then using l'Hopital's rule on that?
 
Beautiful, Mark44, that works.
 
Mark44 said:
How about rewriting the original expression as
\frac{1/x}{e^{1/x}}
and then using l'Hopital's rule on that?

Wouldn't it be nice if you could just cancel the 1/x's?:biggrin:
 
Mark44 said:
Wouldn't it be nice if you could just cancel the 1/x's?:biggrin:

You could, in a way. Replace 1/x = u and take u to infinity instead.
 
By the way, this limit does not exist when we approach zero from the negative numbers, because then the result is infinity/0. I guess both limits from the positive and the negative numbers have to be equal in order for the limit to exist?
 
Nevermind.
 
Last edited:
JG89: I don't get it. Why do you say that x=1 ?
 
  • #10
Ah, I made a mistake. Please disregard that post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K