A little problem involving unitary matrices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of unitary matrices, specifically focusing on the trace of powers of a unitary matrix and the implications for the largest possible value of n given the condition that Tr(U^k) = 0 for all k < n. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the largest possible value for n is N, suggesting that this is achievable for certain forms of unitary matrices.
  • Another participant asserts that n is bounded above by N-1 and discusses the implications of the trace conditions leading to nilpotency, arguing that unitary matrices cannot be nilpotent.
  • A request for references is made regarding the claim that Tr(U^k) cannot be zero for all k if U is unitary, indicating a need for supporting material in a text being written.
  • A later reply challenges the need for references, suggesting that the proof is straightforward and typically presented as an exercise for students.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the trace conditions for unitary matrices, with some proposing specific values for n while others provide counterarguments regarding the bounds and properties of unitary matrices. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the properties of unitary matrices and the implications of the trace conditions, as well as the definitions of nilpotency in this context. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

DavidK
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Assume U is a NxN unitary matrix. Further assume that for all k<n: Tr(U^k)=0. What is the larges possible value for n?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
definition question --
You're using what seems to be only reals for unitary matrices, which are complex. Do you mean orthogonal matrix?
 
Eh? Where does he use anything about reals?
 
I could mention that I have a very strong hunch that the largest possible value for n is N, and that this value is reached for unitaries of the form [tex]<u>_{kl} = \delta_{k+1 mod(N),l} </u>[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Well, n is certainly bound above by N-1, and that bound can be attained. It is a nice exercise to show that, passing to an algebraic closure as necessary, that for an NxN matrix Tr(X^r)=0 for all r from 1 to N inclusive implies that X is nilpotent - this is because these polys are a basis for the symmetric polys in the N eigenvalues (counted with multiplicities) of X, and if they are all zero then so is the product of all the eigenvalues as that is another symmetric poly, which in turn implies one e-value is zero, and by induction all e-values are zero, and X is nilpotent. Since unitary matrices are not nilpotent that puts N as the strict upper bound on n in your question. Certainly 1 is attainable for 2x2 matrices, and it is easy to see that you can get n=N-1 for N prime. I haven't checked your example, but I see no reason not believe you haven't checked it.
 
Matt you don't happen to have a good reference for what you wrote above? You see, I'm using the fact that Tr(U^k) can't be zero for all k if U is unitary in a text I'm writing, but I do not want to litter the text with details regarding this fact. Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
A good reference? No. Just prove it - it takes two lines - the elementary symmetric polys in the e-values must all vanish, hence all symmetric polys in them vanish, in particular the product of all of them, thus one must be zero, and by induction they all are zero, thus it is nilpotent.

I doubt you'll find references for things like that, since it is generally set as an exercise for students.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K