A mass inside a horizontal spring

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 2K views
tecnica
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a spring of length l0 tied to two vertical non moving sticks. We place a mass m at 0,45l0 and let it oscillate. If we measure the period of an oscillation, we can find the angular frequency and calculate k. The question is, how can I calculate k1 and k2, the constants of each one of the pieces on both sides of the mass?

Homework Equations


w=sqrt (k/m)

The Attempt at a Solution


So the thing is, I don't know if k=k1+k2 or 1/k=1/k1+1/k2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Orodruin said:
Which one do you think is correct and why?
We require students to make attempts, the reason for this is that it helps you better in the long run if we help you think rather than simply provide you with an answer.
I guess it is k=k1+k2, because when you move it Δx, the force acting on it is -(k1+k2)Δx, right?
 
Each of the parts of the spring give a force proportional to their spring constants so what you have given is the spring constant relevant for computing the angular frequency. But you should stop and think for a moment if this is actually the spring constant k of the full spring.
 
@Orodruin So the spring constant relevant for computing the angular frequency is the one that obeys k=k1+k2, and the spring constant of the full spring obeys 1/k=1/k1+1/k2, right?
 
Yes. In order to solve this you will also need to think about an additional condition for the relationship between k1 and k2 (a hint is that it will depend on where the mass was connected onto the spring). I also suggest calling the spring constant of the original spring k0 and the spring constant relevant for the angular frequency k in order not to mix them up.
 
Chestermiller said:
tecnica,

If you have two identical springs, except that one spring is twice as long as the other, which one exhibits a higher spring constant?

Chet

I'm guessing the shorter one has a higher spring constant.

Orodruin said:
Yes. In order to solve this you will also need to think about an additional condition for the relationship between k1 and k2 (a hint is that it will depend on where the mass was connected onto the spring). I also suggest calling the spring constant of the original spring k0 and the spring constant relevant for the angular frequency k in order not to mix them up.

Could it be l1k1+l2k2=l0k (where this k is the one used for the angular frequency)? l1 is the distance between the left vertical stick and the mass, and l2 is the distance between the mass and the right stick.
 
tecnica said:
I'm guessing the shorter one has a higher spring constant.
Could it be l1k1+l2k2=l0k (where this k is the one used for the angular frequency)? l1 is the distance between the left vertical stick and the mass, and l2 is the distance between the mass and the right stick.
It might help if you concentrate on one side, l1 say. How does k1 relate to k?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tecnica
haruspex said:
It might help if you concentrate on one side, l1 say. How does k1 relate to k?
Could it be (l1/l0)k1=k ?
 
Thank you guys, I understand it all now :woot: