I A paradox about energy balance and steady state

AI Thread Summary
A paradox arises in a thermal system where a special material generates internal currents and Joule heat while in contact with two temperature reservoirs. The steady-state heat equation suggests energy input equals output, yet the generated Joule heat and an additional special heat source do not balance due to their differing dependencies on temperature. This discrepancy implies that the steady-state condition cannot be achieved, despite starting from that assumption. The discussion also touches on the existence of materials with these properties and the need for simulations to validate the findings. Clarification is sought regarding the surface integral of a tensor product that may affect the energy balance.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
I met a paradox I am unable to resolve.
Here it goes: a special material is placed in thermal contact with 2 reservoirs kept at different temperature. The boundaries of the material that aren't in contact with the reservoirs are thermally insulated. The material being special is able to generate internal currents, a bit like Eddy currents for conductors when placed in a time varying magnetic field. These internal currents generate a Joule heat worth ##\rho \vec J^2## (always positive, i.e. heating the material) in all points in the material where ##\vec J## the current density does not vanish. There is an additional heat source that is more complicated than Joule heat, locally it can be either a cooling or a heating. Note that the currents are internal to the material, they do not have any normal component on the boundaries.
The paradox is that the steady state condition leads to a non steady state condition.
We know for sure that ##\vec J \neq \vec 0## because ##\nabla \times \vec J \propto \Delta T>0##. The material acts therefore a bit like a heat engine, it seems to exploit a temperature difference and do work.... on itself rather than on a load.
The steady-state heat equation has the form ##\nabla \cdot (\kappa \nabla T) + q_\text{Joule} + q_\text{special}=0##, it is derived from non equilibrium thermodynamics and conservation of energy, ##\nabla \cdot \vec J_U=0## where ##\vec J_U=J_Q + V\vec J## is the flux of internal energy, ##\vec J_Q=-\kappa \nabla T +ST\vec J ## is the heat flux, ##S## being a tensor. So far so good, the heat equation tells us that the temperature distribution adapts itself such that the thermal gradient creates a flux that evacuates the generated heats.
However, here comes the problem.
From the steady-state condition ##\nabla \cdot \vec J_U=0##, if we integrate ##\vec J_U## on the whole volume and use Gauss law, we find that the input energy is made of ##Q_\text{in}=\int_{\Gamma_{hot}} -\kappa \nabla T \cdot d\vec A_\text{hot}## only, and the output energy is ##Q_\text{out}=\int_{\Gamma_{cold}} -\kappa \nabla T \cdot d\vec A_\text{cold}##. We get that ##Q_\text{in} - Q_\text{out}=0## must hold for the steady-state to hold.

If we integrate the heat equation on the volume of the material and use Gauss law for the conduction term, we find that ##Q_\text{in} - Q_\text{out}=Q_\text{Joule}+Q_\text{special}## where ##Q_\text{Joule}## and ##Q_\text{special}## are the volume integrals of their respective local formulations written above. At first glance it looks like the special heat evolved has to cancel out exactly Joule heat for the steady state condition to hold. However this is impossible to hold, because Joule heat is proportional to ##\Delta T ^2## whereas the special heat is proportional to ##T \Delta T##. If, by luck, the base temperature of the material has been adjusted so that the 2 heats exactly cancel out globally one another, then we could change the base temperature and the condition cannot hold. This means the steady state condition cannot be fulfilled. But we started assuming a steady state condition... I do not understand where I go wrong.

Note that to keep things simple, no physical property depend on temperature.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Do there even exist real materials which could have your special property or is this just theoretical? I suggest simulation with COMSOL or some such program.
 
Last edited:
bob012345 said:
Do there even exist real materials which could have your special property or is this just theoretical? I suggest simulation with COMSOL or some such program.
Yes they do exist, I already have a finite element code that computes those quantities but I need to make.sure the results make sense.

I believe my error is in computing the surface integral of (ST+V)J dA, where J is parallel to dA. I thought this integral vanishes because J is parallel to dA on all boundaries, but S is a 2x2 matrix, or a tensor, and I suspect this can make the surface integral not vanish. T and V are scalar fields. The VJ part should yield Joule heat whereas the STJ part should yield Qspecial. Can someone tell me whether the surface integral vanishes or not?
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top