A particle with spin 1/2 in a potential well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the energy levels of a spin 1/2 particle in a potential well defined by V(r) and W(r) with an ls interaction. Participants emphasize the need to solve the radial Schrödinger equation while addressing the complexities introduced by the ls interaction at the delta layer. A suggested approach involves transforming the stitching condition to account for the interaction. Additionally, there is a reminder for users to post equations in text format instead of images for clarity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding both the potential and the interaction terms in solving the problem effectively.
kisdrA
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. Help me solve the problem. I don't understand how to handle this type of task.

Find the energy levels of a spin 1/2 particle in a potential well: V(r)+W(r)*(l,s), where V(r<a)=-U, V(r>a)=0, W(r) = q*δ(r-a)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator's note: Thread moved to advanced physics homework help.

@kisdrA you will need to post any relevant equations and show your attempt at a solution.
 
1734856353093.png
 
It is clear that the problem in the potential ##V(r)+W(r)*(l,s)##, but without the (l,s) term: ##V(r)+W(r)##, simply reduces to solving the radial Schrodinger equation. And I understand how to find energy levels in such a task. But what to do when ls interaction also appears in the delta layer?
 
A vector product can be written like this.
##(\overrightarrow{l}, \overrightarrow{s}) = \frac{1}{2} (\overrightarrow{j}^2 - \overrightarrow{l}^2 - \overrightarrow{s}^2)##
Then maybe just transform the stitching condition?
##\Psi^{'}_{II}(a+0) -\Psi^{'}_{I}(a-0) = \frac{2m}{\hbar^{2}}*q*\frac{1}{2}(j(j+1)-l(l+1)-s(s+1)) \Psi_{I,II}(a\pm 0)##
 
kisdrA said:
@kisdrA posting text and equations in images is not allowed here. Please post text and equations directly; use the PF LaTeX feature for equations. There is a LaTeX Guide link at the bottom left of each post window.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Thread 'Stacked blocks & pulley system'
I've posted my attempt at a solution but I haven't gone through the whole process of putting together equations 1 -4 yet as I wanted to clarify if I'm on the right path My doubt lies in the formulation of equation 4 - the force equation for the stacked block. Since we don't know the acceleration of the masses and we don't know if mass M is heavy enough to cause m2 to slide, do we leave F_{12x} undetermined and not equate this to \mu_{s} F_{N} ? Are all the equations considering all...
Back
Top