A passenger train is traveling at 27 m/s when the engineer s

  • #1
argpirate
7
0

Homework Statement


A passenger train is traveling at 27 m/s when the engineer sees a freight train 366 m ahead of his train traveling in the same direction on the same track. The freight train is moving at a speed of 5.9 m/s.
(a) If the reaction time of the engineer is 0.39 s, what is the minimum (constant) rate at which the passenger train must lose speed if a collision is to be avoided?

Homework Equations


dx=vt+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to set the dx=dx and solve for t using the quadratic equation. Then, since we are solving for minimum maginitude of decceleration I set the discriminant (containing 'a') equal to zero so I would get the smallest acceleration magnitude and a real time. But it was marked wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
argpirate said:

Homework Statement


A passenger train is traveling at 27 m/s when the engineer sees a freight train 366 m ahead of his train traveling in the same direction on the same track. The freight train is moving at a speed of 5.9 m/s.
(a) If the reaction time of the engineer is 0.39 s, what is the minimum (constant) rate at which the passenger train must lose speed if a collision is to be avoided?

Homework Equations


dx=vt+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to set the dx=dx and solve for t using the quadratic equation. Then, since we are solving for minimum maginitude of decceleration I set the discriminant (containing 'a') equal to zero so I would get the smallest acceleration magnitude and a real time. But it was marked wrong.
It would be better if you posted your actual calculations, rather than describe verbally the procedure you followed.
 
  • #3
but i did it wrong. If you do it the same way, you will know you did it wrong like me when you read it
 
  • #4
argpirate said:
but i did it wrong. If you do it the same way, you will know you did it wrong like me when you read it
But that's the thing. You want someone to tell you what you did wrong. How is anyone able to do this without checking your actual work? You may have used the wrong procedure, you may have made an arithmetic mistake, etc.

This is Physics Forums, not Psychics Forums. There's no shame in posting erroneous calculations here; people do it all the time.
 
  • #5
i am sure i did it wrong. I just want to know how to do it right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top