# A peer-review system for the ArXiv?

1. Jan 17, 2012

### jrlaguna

The scientific publication scheme is clearly faulty. Although most research in fundamental science is funded by the taxpayer, the average citizen does not have access to the results. Scientific journals are typically quite expensive, although they offer little-to-nothing added value: authoring, typesetting and reviewing is done by the scientists themselves, typically, for free. The database used for impact evaluation is also a private company (Thomson Reuters).

So... why not, as a first step, create a peer-review system on the ArXiv? There are more ideas in this link

http://physicsnapkins.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/occupy_scientific_journals/

2. Jan 17, 2012

### ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Why is it faulty, and why is your suggestion devoid of such faults?

Note that most of the major physics journals allow for the authors to upload the published paper on the authors website, allowing for the free distribution of such papers (read Phys. Rev. policy on this, for example). So your argument that the general public do not have access to such sources is itself faulty. In fact, all one needs to do is contact one of the authors, and ASK for a copy of the paper! Try it!

So considering that free access was the ONLY argument you put forth for the journals to be faulty, and I've already stated how one can get such papers without paying anything, what fault is left?

Zz.

3. Jan 17, 2012

### cgk

Most authors don't actually upload their papers to their websites, however, and there are several branches of science where preprint services are rarely used (e.g., the whole of chemistry, but also some subfields of physics) .

I don't actually agree with the OP[1], but it can hardly be denied that some journals are very expensive, and sometimes the actual value created by the publishers is diminishingly small. Of course as scientists we often do not see that directly, but when I first looked up the budget our librarian had to spend on (online-)journal subscriptions, my jaw dropped to the floor...
I would not mind the cost of the journals if they actually did their job; e.g., did proper editing for language and would at least tell the authors if some of their graphs are completely unintelligible. But as it stands, that is not common practice.

[1]: The journals do provide more: they do typesetting (a short comparison of arxiv papers with the published papers makes the difference obvious), they sometimes offer very basic editing, and, most importantly: they offer a platform for exchange.

4. Jan 17, 2012

### dcpo

Universities currently spend a great deal on subscriptions to journals, with the profits generally not going to the people who do most of the work. Now that paper copies are virtually redundant the only reason to continue with this model is tradition. All that journals provide is a 'seal of approval' from the name recognition, and a focus point for the efforts of those upon whose integrity the good name of the journal is actually based (i.e. the editors and reviewers).

I see only two reasons for submitting to a peer-reviewed journal these days, the first is to spread your research beyond your circle of colleagues, and the second is the recognition that publication in 'name' journals brings (which isn't just about personal glory, if you want to keep an academic position you'd better publish in journals your department recognizes). The question is, could arXiv provide those things if it were peer-reviewed? My thoughts are no, at least initially. It strikes me it would be a tremendous effort to add on some kind review system to arXiv, and I imagine attempting to do so would encounter a great deal of opposition. I can however see Internet based journals with rigorous peer-review bypassing the publisher system gaining significantly in prominence over the next 20 or so years.

5. Jan 17, 2012

### jrlaguna

Many authors do not upload free versions of their papers, to start with. Of course, you can ask for a copy from the authors as a personal favour, no doubt. Nonetheless, I get trouble getting papers quite often. In theoretical physics this is less noted, but in other fields it can be worse. Normally, we have to recourse to friends and colleagues in other universities.

Scientific institutes and universities pay huge amounts of money for their subscription to journals, and for access to the Web of Science. The crisis has made some universities cancel subscriptions, and this is a permanent problem in developing countries.