A plane going into (temporary) orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter mujadeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit Plane
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a jet aircraft simulating weightlessness during a free fall path after reaching a specific speed and angle. Participants are tasked with determining the duration of weightlessness before the aircraft returns to its original altitude.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the problem's requirements, particularly about the role of the angle and the missing original altitude. Others suggest that the problem may be akin to projectile motion, drawing parallels to a cannonball's flight.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have provided insights into the nature of free fall and weightlessness, while others are questioning the completeness of the information given.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that essential information may be missing, such as the original altitude of the aircraft, which is causing uncertainty in the problem's interpretation.

mujadeo
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Early in the space program a jet aircraft was used to simulate "weightless" space flight. Beginning from a comfortable cruising altitude, assume such a craft could reach a speed of v = 590 m/s at an angle q = 30.9° above the horizontal. Subsequently the engines were used only to overcome air friction, and the plane followed a "free fall" path.

How long could "weightlessness" experiments be done before the plane fell back to its original altitude?




Homework Equations


I do not understand what the problem is asking me. I understand what free fall is and how it relates to orbit and "weighlessness" but I 'm not getting what they are asking.
I mean how does the angle play into orbit, if I don't know the original alititude??
Please someone help, --i just need question reasked in a different way ??
thanks for any help!


The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree - Ithink some of the question is missing
 
I believe the problem is not asking about 'orbiting', but rather, it is referring to the parabolic path taken by the aircraft during it's 'free fall'. The problem isn't any different than asking how long a cannonball is in the air when it is fired at an initial speed at a certain angle. For the aircraft, since it is stated that the air friction is overcome just enough by the engines, then the only net force acting on the craft is the force of gravity, and hence, the plane and person is in 'free fall' just like the cannonball or a thrown ball or a person jumping from a tall building or an orbiting space ship. In all cases, the person or object's weight is still there, but since no normal force is acting, their weight is 'apparently' zero, (and you get that 'roller coaster' feeling in your stomach!). So to solve your problem, use the parabolic motion equations to solve for the time it takes to go from cruise altitude and back again to cruise altitude, using V_initial = 590m/s at 30.9 degrees.
 
Last edited:
I assumed you would have to fly downward to get 'weightlessness' - I see the question is assuming you fly up in an arc and get weightless only for the second half of the trajectory.
 
Actually, an object subject to gravity force and gravity force alone is in 'free fall' and 'apparently weightless' (zero G's) regardless of its direction of motion. So the astronaut is 'weightless' throughout the parabolic arc.
 
Of course it is, sorry - looks like my dream of becoming of 'vomit comet' pilot just went out the window!
(note to self: must not reply to physics questions just before going to bed)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K