A positive cosmological constant * SUSY/string theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Lee Smolin asserts that SUSY/string theory fails to account for a positive de Sitter cosmological constant, which has been observed. He argues that the Kodama state in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) provides a viable semiclassical limit that incorporates a small positive cosmological constant, while Witten's paper on Kodama-Chern is not entirely applicable. Current research highlights the challenge of achieving a holographic quantum description in de Sitter space due to its lack of suitable asymptotic conditions, suggesting a counterfactual model where our universe exists as a metastable de Sitter bubble within an AdS universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SUSY/string theory
  • Familiarity with Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG)
  • Knowledge of cosmological constants and their implications
  • Basic concepts of holographic principles in quantum gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Witten's paper on quantum gravity in de Sitter space at arXiv:hep-th/0106109
  • Explore the implications of the Kodama state in Loop Quantum Gravity
  • Investigate the concept of asymptotic behavior in de Sitter spacetimes
  • Research the holographic principle and its limitations in cosmological contexts
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in quantum gravity, particularly those exploring the implications of cosmological constants in string theory and Loop Quantum Gravity.

bananan
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
lee smolin claims that SUSY/string theory can account for negative (anti-DS) and zero cosmological constant, but not a positive de-sitter constant, which is what has been observed.

he also claims the kodama state in LQG has a good semiclassical limit that is GR, and incorporates a small positive CC, and that witten's paper on kodama-chern is not entirely applicable.

what's the current research on these claims?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Witten discusses this in http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106109 . The problem seems to be that a holographic quantum description is impossible in de Sitter space, because it lacks the correct kind of asymtopia to put the holographic data on. On can perhaps avoid this problem by making the counterfactual assumption that the universe is really AdS, and we live in a metastable dS bubble inside the AdS universe.
 
Thomas Larsson said:
Witten discusses this in http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106109 . The problem seems to be that a holographic quantum description is impossible in de Sitter space, because it lacks the correct kind of asymtopia to put the holographic data on. On can perhaps avoid this problem by making the counterfactual assumption that the universe is really AdS, and we live in a metastable dS bubble inside the AdS universe.

Thanks for spotlighting this paper. For my own and others' convenience, I'll copy the abstract here. It seems to fit nicely with your interpretation.

http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106109
Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space
Edward Witten
19pp

"We discuss some general properties of quantum gravity in De Sitter space. It has been argued that the Hilbert space is of finite dimension. This suggests a macroscopic argument that General Relativity cannot be quantized -- unless it is embedded in a more precise theory that determines the value of the cosmological constant. We give a definition of the quantum Hilbert space using the asymptotic behavior in the past and future, without requiring detailed microscopic knowledge. We discuss the difficulties in defining any precisely calculable or measurable observables in an asymptotically de Sitter spacetime, and explore some meta-observables that appear to make mathematical sense but cannot be measured by an observer who lives in the spacetime. This article is an expanded version of a lecture at Strings 2001 in Mumbai."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K