A problem in applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to a circuit with two loops. The user presents equations derived from the loops, indicating a potential error in calculating current I3, which is approximately 4.63 A. The issue is attributed to the lack of clear current direction labels in the provided diagrams. Participants suggest revising the loop equations while ensuring that current directions are accurately represented. Correctly labeling the currents is essential for obtaining valid results in KVL applications.
Patrick Herp
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I stumbled upon a question from my little brother's high school textbook (Fig. 1) where the question is the current through R5.
I tried simplifying the circuit into a single loop first before using the properties of resistors in parallel and easy enough, I found it to be I = 0.66... A.

However, apparently, my brother's problem was when he tried to simplify the circuit into a two-loop circuit (Fig. 2) and then applied Kirchhoff's law.

So, to correct his work while also proving that my method is nevertheless correct, I tried applying KCL to his two-loop circuit. That's where the problem begins.
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, Kirchhoff's Current Law, Ohm's Law
Figure 1, Figure 2

1725221267570.png


1725221329643.png


*I'm using his textbook's rule in applying KVL here:
$$
\begin{aligned}
21I_1 + 4.8I_3 &= 100 &&\textrm{Loop I (clockwise)}\\
24I_2 + 4.8I_3 &= 0 &&\textrm{Loop II (clockwise)} \\
I_1 &= I_2 + I_3
\end{aligned}
$$
From the above equations, I get ##I_3 \approx 4.63\textrm{ A}## which is clearly wrong, but I don't know where
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you'll want to pay attention to the directions of the currents in the two loop circuit. Right now you've got them labelled without directions given.

From your diagram I've put labels on them, such that I1 = I2 + I3:
1725219825923.png

See if you can't write expressions for the two loops, keeping track of the current directions.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top