A problem in probability (complex)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the probability that player A, who has one more coin than player B, throws more tails than player B after all coins are tossed. The context is within probability theory, specifically dealing with combinatorial outcomes of coin tosses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss partitioning the sample space based on the outcomes of the coin tosses and consider different cases for the number of tails thrown by each player. There are attempts to derive expressions for the probabilities based on these partitions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered alternative approaches to simplify the problem, while others are working through the implications of their calculations. There is recognition of potential errors in initial reasoning, and multiple interpretations of the probability calculations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem and the need for careful consideration of the cases where players have equal numbers of tails. There is also mention of the symmetry in the problem that could simplify the analysis.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
The question is simple, but the solution is a monster (or at least mine is). It says,

A player A posesses n+1 normal coins, and a player B posesses n coins of the same kind. Each player throws all of his coins. Show that the probability of A having thrown tails (T) more often than B is ½.

To do this, condition according to wheter A or B has T more often than the other when both players have thrown n coins. (there are 3 possibilities)


Solution:

I identified the fondamental set as [itex]\Omega[/itex]: The result of n throwing of a coin for the two players A and B."

[tex]\Omega=\left\{((x_1^A,x_2^A,...,x_{n+1}^A),(x_1^B,x_2^B,...,x_{n}^B)): x_i^A,x_i^B\in \left\{T,H\right\}\right\}[/tex]

#[tex]\Omega=2^{n+1}2^n = 2^{2n+1}[/tex]

I then define the event of interest as E: Player A has thrown more T than H after all players have thrown all their coins. And I partition the fondamental set like so,

[itex]F_1[/itex]: Player A has more T than player B after n throws.

[itex]F_2[/itex]: Player A has less T than player B after n throws.

[itex]F_3[/itex]: Player A and player B both have the same amount of T after n throws.

According to the "total probability formula", then,

[tex]P(E) = \sum_{i=1}^3P(E\vert F_i)P(F_i) = \sum_{i=1}^3P(E F_i)= \sum_{i=1}^3 \frac{\mbox{card}(EF_i)}{\mbox{card}(\Omega)}[/tex]

So if I find the cardinality of the [itex]EF_i[/itex], I will have won.

Obviously, #[itex]EF_2[/itex]=0, for even if B only has one more T than A after the nth thrown and A gets T at his n+1th thrown, A and B are only at equality. So A cannot win in this case, hence the intersection is empty.

To find #[itex]EF_3[/itex], I said, suppose k is the number of T each player has thrown after their nth thrown. There are [itex]\binom{n}{k}[/itex] ways for each player to thrown k T in n thrown. So there are [itex]\binom{n}{k}^2[/itex] ways for the both of them combined. And, for each of these ways to realize the event "each player throwns k T", there is only one way that A can win, and it is by throwing a T at his n+1th thrown. And since k can be any value btw 0 and n, we must sum on k from 0 to n:

[tex]\mbox{card}(EF_3)=1\cdot\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}^2[/tex]

For #[itex]EF_1[/itex], we first note that for each ways to realize [itex]F_1[/itex], there are two ways to realize E, since player A can either thrown a T or a H at his n+1th thrown and still win (hence the factor 2 in the final expression for #[itex]EF_1[/itex]). To find the number of ways [itex]F_1[/itex] can be realized, we proceed similarly to above. We say, suppose k is the number of T thrown by A after n thrown. There are [itex]\binom{n}{k}[/itex] ways that this can happen. And for each of them, there are

[tex]\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{k-1}{j}[/tex]

ways for B to throw less than k T. So,

[tex]\mbox{card}(EF_1) = 2\cdot\sum_{k=1}^n\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{n}{k}\binom{k-1}{j}[/tex]

All this together yields,

[tex]P(E)=\frac{1}{2^{2n+1}}\left[2\sum_{k=1}^n\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{n}{k}\binom{k-1}{j}+\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}^2 \right][/tex]

This is not equivalent to ½ as can be seen by computing it for n=1. It give P(E) = 2/8=1/4.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't read all that, it looks excessively complicated.

Just look at the 3 cases from their hint. After n throws each, let's say the probability of the same number of tails is x. The probability they don't have the same number of tails is then 1-x, with each equally likely to be in the lead. Calculate the probability A has more tails after the next flip in terms of x before you try to work out what x actually is.


Alternatively, notice that after all the coins have been flipped, A has either more tails than B or more heads than B but not both (why?).
 
Ok, well basically, you start the problem in the same way I do (See my partition in F_1, F_2, F_3 in the OP) but you set P(F_3)=x. Then P(F_1 u F_2) = 1-x <==> P(F_1) = 1-x-P(F_2). Also as in my post, the next step is to say

P(E) = P(F_1)P(E|F_1)+P(F_2)P(E|F_2)+P(F_3)P(E|F_3)

But P(E|F_2)=0, P(E|F_3)=1/2 and P(F_1) = 1-x-P(F_2), so

P(E) = (1-x-P(F_2))P(E|F_1)+x/2

Also, P(E|F_1)=1. So,

P(E) = 1-x/2-P(F_2)

I have a feeling this isn't right.
 
That's right, but notice P(F_1)=P(F_2). Find P(F_2) in terms of x.
 
Oh, I have seen an error in my OP (two actually, but they are of the same nature):

[tex]\mbox{card}(EF_3)=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}^2[/tex]

#EF_3 is only half of F_3 because only for half of the elements of F_3 is [itex]x_{n+1}^A[/itex]=T. For the other half, it is equal to H, which does make make A win.

Similarly,
[tex]\mbox{card}(EF_1) = \mbox{card}(F_1) =\sum_{k=1}^n\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{n}{k}\binom{k-1}{j}[/tex]

because every element of F_1 make A win.

Unfortunately, this agravates the situation. I need more fuel in the numerator, not less!
 
P(F_1)+P(F_2)+P(F_3)=1
2P(F_2)+x=1
P(F_2) = (1-x)/2

==>P(E) = 1-x/2-(1-x)/2 = 1/2

beh :P

Still I'm not going to sleep well until I find what's wrong with my solution in the OP...
 
quasar987 said:
To find the number of ways [itex]F_1[/itex] can be realized, we proceed similarly to above. We say, suppose k is the number of T thrown by A after n thrown. There are [itex]\binom{n}{k}[/itex] ways that this can happen. And for each of them, there are

[tex]\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{k-1}{j}[/tex]

ways for B to throw less than k T.

This appears to be the culprit in your OP. The sum should be:

[tex]\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{n}{j}[/tex]

as you are picking j of the n coins to be tails (or heads, I forget which). The rest looks fine, even the part you said was wrong in a later post. The F_i events are after n tosses, so the cardinality of EF_3 is equal to the cardinality of F_3 (likewise you have F_3 losers corresponding to a tie, then a head on the n+1 coin).You didn't mention my 'alternate' approach, I think it's simpler. To make it clearer, I am saying that after all coins have been tossed, the events "A has more heads than B" and "A has more tails than B" form a partition of your sample space, i.e. they are disjoint and their union is the entire space. By symmetry they have the same cardinality.
 
Thanks a lot shmoe for reading through my monster solution, I did not expect an answer! :smile:

I will check your alternate solution tomorrow morning.
 
P.S. Got any quick idea for a trick one could use to prove that

[tex]\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2^{2n+1}}\left[2\sum_{k=1}^n\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{n}{k}\binom{n}{j}+\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}^2 \right][/tex]

?? :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
  • #10
quasar987 said:
P.S. Got any quick idea for a trick one could use to prove that

You already have, you've shown the big summation is the probability you are after. In another way, you've shown this probability is 1/2.

A combinatorial argument can be so much nicer than an algebraic one. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K