A problem on concurrent forces in a plane.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monsterboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving concurrent forces in a plane, specifically determining the angle of tilt ##\theta## for a ball resting in a trough. Participants explore the relationship between the reactive forces at two points, A and B, under the condition that the reactive force at B is one-third that at A, assuming smooth surfaces. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and application of Lami's theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to derive a relationship between ##\theta## and the ratio of reactions ##R_a## and ##R_b##, noting that at ##\theta = 0##, the ratio is one, and at a specific ##\theta##, it becomes three.
  • Another participant suggests using a free body diagram (FBD) to set up normal forces based on static equilibrium, emphasizing the need to consider the angle of the trough.
  • A participant reports arriving at an angle of 16.13 degrees but questions whether an alternative derivation method exists, expressing interest in exploring different approaches.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about deriving an equation similar to the one mentioned, suggesting that the answer likely depends on the non-linear trigonometry of the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to derive the relationship for ##\theta##, with some expressing uncertainty about the feasibility of alternative approaches and others focusing on the trigonometric aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of the problem due to multiple unknowns and the non-linear nature of the trigonometric relationships involved. There is also a reference to the specific angles involved in the setup, which may affect the calculations.

Monsterboy
Messages
305
Reaction score
96

Homework Statement


[/B]
A ball rests in a trough as shown in figure. Determine the angle of tilt ##\theta## with the horizontal so that the reactive force at B will be one-third at A if all surfaces are perfectly smooth.

2.Relevant equations

Application of Lami's theorem and some algebra and geometry

3.The attempt at a solution

I tried to derive an relation between ## \theta ## and the Ratio between the reactions Ra and Rb ,so at ##\theta## =00 the ratio between the reactions is one and at a particular ##\theta## the ratio becomes 3. The relation goes like this ##f(\theta) = x\frac{Ra}{Rb} ## where ##x## is a constant
This didn't lead me anywhere because there are too many unknowns.

Another equation i can think of is ##\theta ##= x(Ra-Rb) so at ##\theta =0 ## , Ra =Rb at what ##\theta## will Ra=3Rb?? The required angle ##\theta= x(2Rb) ## and ##x= \frac{\theta}{2Rb}##

I don't see this going anywhere either.
Is this the right way to go ?
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    53.8 KB · Views: 1,128
Physics news on Phys.org
Monsterboy said:

Homework Statement


°°[/B]
A ball rests in a trough as shown in figure. Determine the angle of tilt ##\theta## with the horizontal so that the reactive force at B will be one-third at A if all surfaces are perfectly smooth.

2.Relevant equations

Application of Lami's theorem and some algebra and geometry

3.The attempt at a solution

I tried to derive an relation between ## \theta ## and the Ratio between the reactions Ra and Rb ,so at ##\theta## =00 the ratio between the reactions is one and at a particular ##\theta## the ratio becomes 3. The relation goes like this ##f(\theta) = x\frac{Ra}{Rb} ## where ##x## is a constant
This didn't lead me anywhere because there are too many unknowns.

Another equation i can think of is ##\theta ##= x(Ra-Rb) so at ##\theta =0 ## , Ra =Rb at what ##\theta## will Ra=3Rb?? The required angle ##\theta= x(2Rb) ## and ##x= \frac{\theta}{2Rb}##

I don't see this going anywhere either.
Is this the right way to go ?
I don't see why you can't draw a FBD of the ball and set up the normal forces on each contact surface using the conditions of static equilibrium.

Remember, the angle θ must be incorporated into the angle of the trough measured w.r.t. the bottom of the wedge. When θ = 0, then these angles will both be 30° as indicated on the diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Monsterboy
Thanks ,i took a little more time than expected to incorporate the angle since i had to imagine the thing to rotate ,i got the answer 16.13 degrees ,is there anyway to derive an equation like the one i mentioned ? i am just trying to find some alternative methods( if there are any).
 
Monsterboy said:
Thanks ,i took a little more time than expected to incorporate the angle since i had to imagine the thing to rotate ,i got the answer 16.13 degrees ,is there anyway to derive an equation like the one i mentioned ? i am just trying to find some alternative methods( if there are any).
I doubt it, since the answer, I think, depends on the trigonometry of the situation, which is not linear.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K