A projectile fired upwards on earth and mars.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a projectile fired upwards from Earth to land back on Mars, given the gravitational accelerations of both planets: gE=9.8 m/s² for Earth and gM=3.72 m/s² for Mars. The initial velocity is derived from the time of flight on Earth, which is 10 seconds, leading to an upward velocity of 98 m/s. The correct approach involves using the kinematic equation x(t) = (1/2)at² + v0t to find the time of flight on Mars by substituting the Martian gravitational acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Basic calculus concepts, including integration
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration values for Earth and Mars
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations and their applications in projectile motion
  • Learn about gravitational acceleration differences between celestial bodies
  • Explore integration techniques in calculus for motion problems
  • Practice solving projectile motion problems in varying gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or calculus, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in the effects of gravity on projectile motion across different planets.

m0286
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hello
I have a calculus problem (1st year) that I cannot solve I am completely confused:
It says:
We are given that the Earth's gravitational acceleration is gE=9.8m/s^2 (downward) and that on Mars gM=3.72m's^2 (downward)
If a projectile is fired upwards from the Earth it lands back on Earth in 10seconds. How long will the projectile take to land back on the surface of Mars if it is fired upwards with the same initial velocity?

So what I've done is:
Earth: d(t)=1/2at^2 so x(t)=490m... so would this be the entire distance or just the distance downward, so that the entire distance would be 980?

Then since velocity =d/t its 980/10s =98m/s (or) 490/10 =49m/s... (not sure which one to use)
And d(t)=vt+1/2at^2 So would I just take the values I got.. and plug them and the Mars acceleration in this equation and solve for t?? Or I have I done something completely wrong? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m0286 said:
Hello
I have a calculus problem (1st year) that I cannot solve I am completely confused:
It says:
We are given that the Earth's gravitational acceleration is gE=9.8m/s^2 (downward) and that on Mars gM=3.72m's^2 (downward)
If a projectile is fired upwards from the Earth it lands back on Earth in 10seconds. How long will the projectile take to land back on the surface of Mars if it is fired upwards with the same initial velocity?

So what I've done is:
Earth: d(t)=1/2at^2 so x(t)=490m...
Okay, that's wrong! That would be for something that had initial velocity 0. It would fall a distance (1/2)at^2 in time t. The whole point here is that the object has an initial velocity, upward, otherwise it wouldn't move upward at all. Of course, you aren't told that initial velocity- that's why you are told that the time it takes to come back to earth- so you can calculate that.

Since this was posted in the "Calculus and beyond" section, I presume that you know how to do this:
dv/dt= a so v= dx/dt= at+ v0, where v0 is the initial velocity. Integrating again, x(t)= (1/2)at2+ v0t+ x0. Taking the initial height, x0, to be 0, we have just x(t)= (1/2)at2+ v0t. Obviously, when t= 0, x(0)= 0. But you are also told that x(10)= 0. What must v0 be for that to be true (with a= -980 of course)?

Now replace a with -3.72, use that same v0 and solve (1/2)at2+ v0t= 0 for t. (That has one obvious answer and the other is easy.)

so would this be the entire distance or just the distance downward, so that the entire distance would be 980?

Then since velocity =d/t its 980/10s =98m/s (or) 490/10 =49m/s... (not sure which one to use)
And d(t)=vt+1/2at^2 So would I just take the values I got.. and plug them and the Mars acceleration in this equation and solve for t?? Or I have I done something completely wrong? Thanks
 
Thanks!

ohhhh
Makes so much more sense to me now, i got it.. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K