A question about a YouTube video on Thales's Theorem

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter murshid_islam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Video Youtube
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a YouTube video where Michael discusses Thales's Theorem, specifically at 4:23, where he claims that the points where rays contact the circumference are diametrically opposed. Participants clarify that this statement reflects the converse of Thales's Theorem, which is also true. They argue that while Michael's assertion is arguably correct, it lacks precision and could mislead viewers regarding the theorem's definition. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical communication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thales's Theorem
  • Familiarity with the concept of converses in geometry
  • Basic knowledge of circle geometry
  • Ability to analyze mathematical statements for precision
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formal definition of Thales's Theorem
  • Study the implications of converses in geometric theorems
  • Explore the relationship between diametrically opposed points and circle properties
  • Examine examples of mathematical communication and precision in teaching
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, students studying geometry, and anyone interested in the precise communication of mathematical concepts.

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
TL;DR
Is this Thales's Theorem or the converse of Thales's Theorem?
Here is the video in question:

In the video at 4:23, Michael says, "Now Thales's Theorem tells us that the two other points, where these rays contact the circumference, are diametrically opposed. They are on opposite sides of the circle and a line passing through them will pass through the centre."

Isn't that the converse of Thales's Theorem? Yes, the converse is true as well, but what was stated in the video isn't Thales's theorem; it's the converse as far as I understand. Am I missing something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are correct - it is the converse and, in this case, the converse is also true.

That said, it is a combination of Thales's Theorem and other logic that would tell us that those two points are diametrically opposed. So his statement "Thales's Theorem tells us that the two other points, where these rays contact the circumference, are diametrically opposed" is arguably correct or arguably incomplete.

Since the title of his Video is "Thales's Theorem", he should probably have been more precise.
 
It's a relatively trivial consequence of the theorem, or even part of the theorem if you prefer that view. There is no authority that would define what exactly is part of a theorem and what is not.*

*even though I had a professor thinking they would be that authority
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
716
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
12K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K