B A question about induced current in LC circuits

AI Thread Summary
In an LC circuit, when a capacitor discharges, it generates a magnetic field in the inductor due to the flowing current. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the direction of this magnetic field and the polarity of the inductor, suggesting that the magnetic field should oppose changes in current. It clarifies that the voltage across the inductor is not induced but rather applied by the capacitor, and the current behavior is described by specific inductor equations. The conversation also points out the need for clearer diagrams and references, as many sources inadequately address inductor polarity. Overall, understanding the bidirectional nature of inductors is crucial for interpreting their behavior in circuits.
mymodded
Messages
29
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
when a capacitor starts discharging, why is the induced magnetic field in the inductor in the same direction of the current? isn't it supposed to resist changes in current?
Let's say we have an LC circuit and we begin with the capacitor fully charged, it then starts discharging, and currents begins to flow in the circuit, and a magnetic field is generated in the inductor because of the current flowing through it. My question is, why is the magnetic field in this direction (figure b)? this magnetic field implies that the induced current is in the same direction as the current coming from the discharging of the capacitor, but the inductor is supposed to resist changes in current, so shouldn't its magnetic field be in the opposite direction? same with figure f.
1717076776380.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, that figure just doesn't make sense to me either. Maybe if you showed us the source of that we could sort it out.

I guess you mean the potential (voltage) across the inductor, not really the field. The inductor voltage is the same as the capacitor voltage, it's not "induced" it's applied externally by the capacitor. Then the current in the loop is determined by the inductor equation ##i(t) = \frac{1}{L} \int_0^t v(\tau) \, d\tau + i(0)## or ## v(t) = L \frac{di(t)}{dt} ##.

I would look for another source to explain this circuit. Khan Academy is pretty good, but there are hundreds of others on the web.
 
That diagram is misleading.
The bar graphs do not show polarity.
There is no reference ground marked.

The red arrows, B, consistently point in the same direction as the current. But the polarity of B, will depend on whether the inductor is wound with a left-hand or a right-hand helix, and if the flux shown is internal or external to the solenoid.
 
DaveE said:
Sorry, that figure just doesn't make sense to me either. Maybe if you showed us the source of that we could sort it out.

I guess you mean the potential (voltage) across the inductor, not really the field. The inductor voltage is the same as the capacitor voltage, it's not "induced" it's applied externally by the capacitor. Then the current in the loop is determined by the inductor equation ##i(t) = \frac{1}{L} \int_0^t v(\tau) \, d\tau + i(0)## or ## v(t) = L \frac{di(t)}{dt} ##.

I would look for another source to explain this circuit. Khan Academy is pretty good, but there are hundreds of others on the web
sorry I think I didn't make my question very clear, I was talking about the polarity of the inductor, that in figure b it should have been positive in the lower side and negative in the upper side, and in my textbook's circuit, that arrow should indicate something about the polarity (even though it shows the field lines). I looked at many sources, and almost nobody talked about the polarity of the inductor. Libretexts pretty much explained it the same way my textbook did. And I noticed something, my textbook and libretexts' current graphs start negative, while the one at khan academy starts positive
1717094684116.png

1717094795452.png
 
mymodded said:
I didn't make my question very clear, I was talking about the polarity of the inductor
Umm... still not clear to me. Inductors rarely have polarity, they work bidirectionally. The polarity is in the equation. If you apply a voltage across the inductor, the current will start to change, increasing the flow from the positive voltage side to the negative voltage side. If you switch the voltage polarity the direction of the current change with switch with it. For example:

PXL_20240530_193002290~2.jpg
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top