pswongaa
- 7
- 0
if lebesgue integral of f^2 over an interval equal 0, must f=0 a.e on that interval?
The discussion revolves around the properties of the Lebesgue integral, specifically whether the integral of the square of a function being zero implies that the function itself is zero almost everywhere (a.e.) on a given interval. The scope includes theoretical aspects of measure theory and properties of measurable functions.
Participants express differing views on whether the integral condition implies that the function is zero a.e. Some argue in favor of this implication under certain conditions, while others challenge this by suggesting the existence of counterexamples. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants have not explicitly defined the nature of the function f, leading to ambiguity regarding whether it is real or complex, which affects the validity of the claims made. Additionally, the assumptions regarding the measure space and the properties of the functions involved are not fully explored.
What negative parts, R136a1? He's integrating f(x)2 over some interval.R136a1 said:No. Try to find a counterexample (hint: the integral can be 0 since positive and negative parts cancel out).
Is f a function that maps reals to reals, or something else?pswongaa said:if lebesgue integral of f^2 over an interval equal 0, must f=0 a.e on that interval?