A question about perturbation series inversion

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
let be m a measures (by expermients) physical quantity and m0 a 'bare' value of these physical quantity , let us suppose that we can expand

[tex]m= m_{0}+f(k,m_{0})+ \sum_{n} u^{n}c_{n}[/tex]

for some finite quantities c_n and [tex]u=log(\Lambda)[/tex] with lambda a regulator

can we then invert the series above to express

[tex]log(\Lambda)= g( f(k,m_{0}) , m , m_{0})[/tex]

how about if instead of logarithms of regulator there are also powers of regulator i mean quantities proportional to [tex]\Lambda ^{k}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zetafunction said:
let us suppose that we can expand

[tex]m= m_{0}+f(k,m_{0})+ \sum_{n} u^{n}c_{n}[/tex]

for some finite quantities c_n and [tex]u=log(\Lambda)[/tex] with lambda a regulator

can we then invert the series above to express

[tex]log(\Lambda)= g( f(k,m_{0}) , m , m_{0})[/tex]

One can formally solve every equation [tex]\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_nu^n=x[/tex]
with nonzero c_1 to an equation [tex]\sum_{n=1}^\infty d_nx^n=u[/tex]; simply substitute one into the other and compare coefficients to get recurrence relations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K