A question about physical chemistry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical chemistry problem of a particle in a one-dimensional box with potential V(x) defined as zero within the interval [0, a] and infinite outside. The participant identifies a contradiction regarding the wavefunction (2/a)^(1/2)sin(nπx/a), which is not an eigenfunction of the momentum operator due to the ill-defined nature of momentum in an infinite potential well. The participant concludes that the momentum operator fails to commute with the Hamiltonian, as translation cannot occur in this constrained system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wavefunctions and operators.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in the context of quantum operators.
  • Concept of potential wells and their implications on particle behavior in quantum physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics.
  • Research the concept of momentum operators in quantum systems, particularly in infinite potential wells.
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of wavefunctions for particles in various potential scenarios.
  • Learn about the role of commutation relations in quantum mechanics and their physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physical chemistry, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers focusing on quantum systems and operator theory.

hgnk708113
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Please post this type of questions in HW section using the template.
For the problem of particle in a 1D box
V(x)=0 for 0≦x≦a
∞ for anywhere outside the box
I know that Hamiltonian operator commutes with momentum operator
so they should have smae eigenfunction but it's obvious that the wavefunction
(2/a)^1/2sin(nπx/a) is not a eigenfunction of linear momentum operator
what is the reason for the contradiction ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The momentum operator in infinite well potential is not well defined to begin with, this is because momentum operator is supposed to act as a generator of translation, while such a translation in infinite well potential cannot take place. Moreover, even after you define a "momentum-like" operator ##\hat{p}##, it does not commute with the global Hamiltonian.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hgnk708113
Thanks for your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K