A question about the Frénet–Serret Apparatus

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Frénet–Serret formulas, specifically addressing the expression for the unit tangent vector T = (dr/ds) / |dr/ds|. Participants noted that since |dr/ds| equals 1 in this context, including the norm is unnecessary. The Wikipedia article correctly omits this term in subsequent sections, indicating a lack of clarity in the initial presentation. This highlights the importance of precision in mathematical definitions and the potential for confusion in educational resources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of unit vectors
  • Knowledge of the Frénet–Serret formulas
  • Basic comprehension of derivatives with respect to arc length
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Frénet–Serret formulas in detail
  • Explore applications of the Frénet–Serret apparatus in differential geometry
  • Learn about the implications of unit vectors in physics and engineering
  • Investigate common misconceptions in vector calculus through academic resources
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those studying differential geometry and vector calculus, will benefit from this discussion.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading the Wikipedia article about this, and I've noticed something that doesn't seem to make sense:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenet–Serret_formulas

The article says that the unit vector for the tangent direction is:

T = ( dr / ds ) / | dr / ds |

OK, that's the standard way to express a unit vector, but it seems that in this case, | dr / ds | is 1, so what is the point of including this term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're correct, there is no point. Wiki has it without the norm in the very next section and gets it correct in other places.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K