Undergrad A question about writing the notation of the nabla operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation of the nabla operator in Vector Analysis, defined as $$\nabla = \hat{x} \frac {∂} {∂x} + \hat{y} \frac {∂} {∂y} + \hat{z} \frac {∂} {∂z}$$. Participants confirm that accenting the nabla operator with a right arrow, represented as $$\vec{\nabla}$$, is acceptable. The consensus emphasizes that the choice of notation should align with the conventions used for vector quantities, such as boldface or overhead arrows.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Vector Analysis
  • Familiarity with differential operators
  • Knowledge of vector notation conventions
  • Basic calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the different notations for vector operators in mathematical literature
  • Explore the applications of the nabla operator in gradient, divergence, and curl
  • Study vector calculus textbooks for notation consistency
  • Learn about the implications of notation choices in mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with vector calculus and require clarity on notation conventions for vector differential operators.

sams
Gold Member
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
I have a simple question about the notation of the nabla operator in Vector Analysis. The nabla operator is a vector differential operator and it is written as:

$$\nabla = \hat{x} \frac {∂} {∂x} + \hat{y} \frac {∂} {∂y} + \hat{z} \frac {∂} {∂z}$$

Is it okay if we accented nabla by a right arrow such that

$$\vec{\nabla} = \hat{x} \frac {∂} {∂x} + \hat{y} \frac {∂} {∂y} + \hat{z} \frac {∂} {∂z}$$

Excuse me for this silly question, but I want to know the correct notation for nabla, since I am encountering both notations on the internet. Thank you so much in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how you note vectors. Common notations include the overhead arrow, as you wrote, but using boldface is also quite common.

The nabla operator is a vector operator, so use whatever notation you are using for vector quantities.
 
  • Like
Likes sams
Thank you DrClaude for your continuous help...
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K