A question on proof of Riesz Representation Theorem when p=1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of the Riesz Representation Theorem as presented in Bartle's "The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure". The key equation discussed is G(f)=∫f g dμ, where the challenge is to demonstrate that the function g, determined by the Radon-Nikodym Theorem, belongs to the L^∞ space, indicating it is bounded almost everywhere. The proof provided utilizes a contradiction approach, assuming g is not bounded and leading to a contradiction with the boundedness of G.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Riesz Representation Theorem
  • Familiarity with the Radon-Nikodym Theorem
  • Knowledge of L^1 and L^∞ spaces in functional analysis
  • Basic concepts of Lebesgue integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Riesz Representation Theorem in detail
  • Explore the implications of the Radon-Nikodym Theorem on function spaces
  • Learn about properties of L^∞ spaces and their significance in analysis
  • Investigate Lebesgue integrability and its relationship with bounded functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in analysis, and anyone studying measure theory and functional analysis will benefit from this discussion.

zzzhhh
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
This question comes from the proof of Riesz Representation Theorem in Bartle's "The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure", page 90-91, as the image below shows.
[URL]http://i3.6.cn/cvbnm/ac/9a/a3/3d06837bc78f74ba103b6d242a78e3a1.png[/URL]

The equation (8.10) is [tex]G(f)=\int fgd\mu[/tex].

The definition of [tex]L^\infty[/tex] space is as follows:
[URL]http://i3.6.cn/cvbnm/a5/0e/22/259193b92d8d2ef4878532eefec4d900.png[/URL]

My question is: why the g determined by Radon-Nikodym Theorem is in [tex]L^\infty[/tex]? I can only prove that it is Lebesgue integrable, that is, belongs to [tex]L^1[/tex] space, but the proof mentions no word on why it is in [tex]L^\infty[/tex], that is, bounded a.e.. Could you please tell me how to prove this? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
zzzhhh said:
I can only prove that it is Lebesgue integrable, that is, belongs to [tex]L^1[/tex] space
The L^1 property already comes from Radon-Nikodym, right? Radon-Nikodym says such a g in L^1 exists. To prove it is also in L^\infty, what about this:

Suppose g is not a.e. bounded, then for every n we can find An with [itex]0<\mu(A_n)<\infty[/itex] such that for all [itex]x\in A_n[/itex] we have [itex]|g(x)|>n[/itex]. Now take
[tex]f_0:=\frac{1_{A_n}|g|}{g}.[/tex]

Then

[tex]\|G\|=\sup\frac{|Gf|}{\|f\|}\geq \frac{|Gf_0|}{\|f_0\|}=\frac{1}{\mu(A_n)}\left|\int fg\right|=\frac{1}{\mu(A_n)}\int_{A_n} |g|>n,[/tex]

in contradiction with G being bounded.
 
Yes! this is the proof! Thank you for the ingenious construction, I got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K