A Simple angular momentum analysis question (check my solution please)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of angular momentum, specifically focusing on the properties of commutators in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correctness of a solution regarding the commutation relations of angular momentum operators. There are suggestions to write out specific expressions and to avoid shortcuts in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to clarify the correct formulation of commutation relations. Some participants provide guidance on how to approach the problem more carefully, while others express confusion about the original poster's solution.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of errors in the original poster's notation and calculations, as well as references to the need for more detailed steps in the analysis. The conversation also includes a light-hearted comment that deviates from the main topic.

Wan Anavan
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Analysis of Angular Momentum
Relevant Equations
Commutators
Commutators Angular Momentum.jpeg

is my solution correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Not the way you write it. $$[L_x,L_y]=-i\hbar L_z$$

[edit] Sorry for confusing you. I made (a single) a sign error too !

The intention was to write $$[L_x,L_y]=\ \ \ i\hbar L_z\\ \ [L_y,L_x]=-i\hbar L_z$$

Two wrongs doesn't make a right
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wan Anavan
Wan Anavan said:
Homework Statement:: Analysis of Angular Momentum
Relevant Equations:: Commutators

View attachment 261736
is my solution correct?

You are not being careful enough. You must write out more steps as you're going wrong with the shortcuts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wan Anavan
No. Write out ##L_+## and ##L_-## and explicitly multiply
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wan Anavan
BvU said:
No. Write out L+L+ and L−L− and explicitly multiply
PeroK said:
You are not being careful enough. You must write out more steps as you're going wrong with the shortcuts.
last commutation.jpeg

then the answer is not zero
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
This time answer and solution are correct.
You can check yourself by working out ##\Bigl [L_+,L_-\Bigr ]## :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wan Anavan
[ hijack ]
BvU said:
Two wrongs doesn't make a right
LOL. Shouldn't that be "Too wrongs doesn't make a right"? :wink:

[ /hijack ]
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K