A simple computation using Leibniz's Rule

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jakemf1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differentiation of a variable V defined by an integral equation involving a constant r and a function F with support on [0,∞). The key conclusion is that the correct derivative of V with respect to b is given by the formula \(\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)}\). The user’s attempted solution introduced an additional term in the denominator, indicating a potential error in applying Leibniz's Rule. A forum member pointed out that the differentiation of the integral terms may have been performed incorrectly due to the dependence on V.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Leibniz's Rule for differentiation under the integral sign.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and its applications in defining variables.
  • Knowledge of probability theory, specifically the properties of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs).
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and manipulation of equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Leibniz's Rule in differentiating integrals with variable limits.
  • Study the properties of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) and their derivatives.
  • Explore advanced topics in integral calculus, focusing on differentiation techniques.
  • Practice solving similar problems involving implicit differentiation and integral equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced differentiation techniques and integral equations.

jakemf1986
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A simple computational question, that I saw in a journal article and have been having trouble getting.

Define the variable V (implicitly) by:

[itex]V=b + \int^{rV}_{0} rV dF(s) + \int^{\infty}_{rV} s dF(s)[/itex],

where r is a constant and F has support on [0,∞).

Question: Show that [itex]\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)}[/itex],

My attempted solution: Differentiate with respect to V and use Leibniz's Rule to get

[itex]1=\frac{db}{dV} + r\cdot rVf(V) - 0 + \int^{rV}_0 r dF(s) + 0 - rVf(V) + 0 = \frac{db}{dV} + r^{2} Vf(V) + rF(rV) - rVf(V)[/itex]

Rearrangement yields

[itex]\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)+rVf(V)(1-r)}[/itex]

Notice that my solution has an additional ugly term in the denominator.

Is my solution wrong? Or could perhaps a mistake have been made in the article?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump =)
 
Hey jakemf1986 and welcome to the forums.

I think you have differentiated at least one of the integral terms incorrectly since one of the limits involves V. When this happens you need to use a special kind of chain rule.

Does this help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K