Differentiation under the Integral Sign

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differentiation under the integral sign, specifically in the context of a variable V defined by an integral equation involving a constant r and a cumulative distribution function F. The user attempts to differentiate V with respect to b using Leibniz's Rule, arriving at a solution that includes an additional term in the denominator compared to the expected result. The correct derivative is established as \(\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)}\), indicating a potential error in the user's calculation or the original article.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, particularly differentiation techniques.
  • Familiarity with Leibniz's Rule for differentiating under the integral sign.
  • Knowledge of cumulative distribution functions and their properties.
  • Basic concepts of economic modeling involving integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Leibniz's Rule in detail to master differentiation under the integral sign.
  • Explore cumulative distribution functions and their applications in economics.
  • Review integral calculus techniques relevant to economic modeling.
  • Examine examples of differentiation in economic literature to identify common pitfalls.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in economics, mathematicians focusing on calculus, and anyone interested in advanced differentiation techniques in mathematical modeling.

jakemf1986
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is not actually a homework question but something I saw in a (economics) journal article and have been having trouble getting. It's very simple so I thought I'd post it here.

Define the variable V (implicitly) by:

[itex]V=b + \int^{rV}_{0} rV dF(s) + \int^{\infty}_{rV} s dF(s)[/itex],

where r is a constant and F has support on [0,∞).

Question: Show that [itex]\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)}[/itex],

My attempted solution: Differentiate with respect to V and use Leibniz's Rule to get

[itex]1=\frac{db}{dV} + r\cdot rVf(V) - 0 + \int^{rV}_0 r dF(s) + 0 - rVf(V) + 0 = \frac{db}{dV} + r^{2} Vf(V) + rF(rV) - rVf(V)[/itex]

Rearrangement yields

[itex]\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)+rVf(V)(1-r)}[/itex]

Notice that my solution has an additional ugly term in the denominator.

Is my solution wrong? Or could perhaps a mistake have been made in the article?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump =)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K