A small black hole goes thru a toroidal hole.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter negativzero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical interactions between a small black hole and a larger toroidal black hole, exploring the implications of such encounters on energy transfer and the stability of the structures involved. Participants consider various models and hypotheses related to black hole physics, magnetic fields, and particle behavior in these extreme environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether energy can pass through a toroidal black hole when a smaller black hole travels through it, suggesting various possible outcomes including collapse into a spherical hole or energy ejection.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the concept of a 'toroidal black hole', indicating uncertainty about existing models.
  • Some participants reference Poplowski's torsion model and express confusion about the behavior of electrons and positrons in magnetic fields, speculating on their trajectories in relation to black holes.
  • A participant discusses the implications of Freidman's Topological Censorship theorem, suggesting that light cannot pass through the central toroidal hole without a topological change.
  • There are speculations about the energy dynamics involved when a smaller black hole interacts with a toroidal structure, including potential energy release during a transition from toroidal to spherical topology.
  • One participant humorously reflects on the limits of knowledge regarding mini-toroidal black holes and their energy storage capabilities.
  • Another participant challenges the mainstream views on black holes, suggesting a need for deeper inquiry into their interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views and remains unresolved, with participants expressing differing opinions on the behavior of black holes and the implications of their interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of complex theories and models, and there are references to unresolved mathematical and conceptual challenges related to black hole physics.

  • #31
Thx, Denny! i will read this. Smolin thinks Rovelli is tops. And Lee Smolin just replaced Wheeler as my formost fav cosmologist. Mostly it's because he makes me think. Like listening to talk radio hosts that you never agree with, but without the anger.
-0
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
negativzero said:
You're blaming Hilbert?

Blaming? That's an interesting choice of words...

Chronos, I'm just trying to find anyone who will talk to me. Your down to terra approach is greatly appreciated.
And I'm pretty sure that you are smarter...even though i have a 106 IQ. Or i did at one time. And that's pretty high in this neck O' th' woods.
-0

If you're looking for people to talk to, I'd advise against throwing an IQ number around. It's pretty meaningless.
 
  • #33
"Blaming?" Okay, crediting. Excuse my sense of humor please. And the 105ish IQ? That's actually my best friend's joke. i admit i stole from him, and i would name him except i assume he doesn't want to be included.
.
i look to veteran posters to give me guidance in this new environment.
.
And i did read the article and made some comments which were lost in the cloud. Big loss! My humor again...i hope that humor is okay if i can find anyone who shares my sense of it. If humor is not okay i would like to know this as soon as possible.
.
-0
 
  • #34
not a friendly space here ...bye
 
  • #35
negativzero said:
not a friendly space here ...bye

Statements like this are the reason you're not receiving the warmest of welcomes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K