A space vehicle splitting into two parts (velocity question)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum for a space vehicle that separates into two parts. The vehicle, initially traveling at 1400 m/s, splits into two masses: 859 kg (m1) and 250 kg (m2). The final velocities calculated are approximately 1372.95 m/s for m1 and 1492.95 m/s for m2, after applying the conservation of momentum principle. The importance of maintaining significant figures in calculations to minimize rounding errors was also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations related to momentum
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Ability to perform unit conversions and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in detail
  • Practice solving problems involving momentum before and after collisions
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, such as impulse and momentum transfer
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and momentum, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to momentum conservation in explosive separations.

MNWO
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, so i have finished this question but I am not sure if I did it right. Could you guys check it and tell me if its right or show me where i went wrong.
This is the question:
A space vehicle traveling At a velocity of 1400m/s separates by a controlled explosion into two sections of mass 859kg (m1) and 250 kg (m2). The two parts then carry on in the same direction with the heavier rear section moving 120m/s slower than the lighter front section. Determine the final velocity of each section.

Homework Equations


Mass1=859 kg
Mass2:250kg
M1+M2=1109 kg
1109kg x 1400m/s = 1552600 N

The Attempt at a Solution


So the vehicle is creating 1552600N of force, the faster part shouldbe moving slower by 120m so
1552600-120=1552480
1552480/1109 (m1+m2)
=1399.89 m/s
speed of M1 is 1399.89m/s
So the speed of M2 will be 1399.89+120
M2=1519.89m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MNWO said:
1109kg x 1400m/s = 1552600 N

This is not force (N = kg·m/s2). It's momentum (kg·m/s), which unfortunately doesn't have a special unit name for it.

So the vehicle is creating 1552600N of force, the faster part shouldbe moving slower by 120m so
1552600-120=1552480

Even after correcting N to kg·m/s, you can't subtract velocity (m/s) from momentum (kg·m/s). The units don't match.

Have you studied conservation of momentum yet?
 
Damn it, could you explain how to work it out? My deadline is tomorrow and this is the only question I am stuck with now.
 
Conservation of momentum means "total momentum after explosion = total momentum before explosion." Can you set up an equation for that?
 
So I have worked it out like this:
Momentum before explosion
mass1 (m1)= 859kg
mass2 (m2)=250kg
859kg+250kg=1109kg
1109kg x 1400ms= 1552600 N
they are moving with two diferrent velocities with the velocity of the smaller mass(v2) moving faster by 120m/s so
v2-v1=120m/s
v2=v1+120 m/s
I can calculate how much more force the second mass will travell with.
250kg x 120ms=30000 N
1552600N-30000N=1522600N
1522600N/1109kg=1372.948602 ms
because i have subtracted the 120ms(30000N) from the total force that means I am calculating v1 so
v1=1372.948602 m/s
v2=1372.948602 +120=1492.948602 m/s
momentum before separation (m1+m2) v = m1 x v1 + m2 x v2 (momentum after separation)
CHECK:
859(m1) x 1372.948602(v1) + 250(m2) x 1492.948602(v2)= 1552600N
I think this is right , took me a long time to figure it out.
 
MNWO said:
v1=1372.948602 m/s
v2=1372.948602 +120=1492.948602 m/s

You got it! :D

The only other thing I would do is round off the final results to a more realistic number of significant figures, corresponding to the numbers that you were originally given. (But it's good to keep the extra digits in the intermediate steps to avoid roundoff error.)
 
I used these extra digits because when i was checking the anwser it was wrong by about 9-10 m/s, then i realized that those numbers after the dot make a difference. Anyways thanks for help I really appreciate it :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
1K