A Steamroller on a Slope (Moment of Inertia)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The acceleration of a steamroller with a total mass of 12,000 kg on a 4° slope, equipped with two homogeneous cylindrical wheels each weighing 3,000 kg, is calculated to be approximately 0.54728 m/s². This value is derived using the moment of inertia formula J = 1/2 mr² and considering the torque M = J*α. Key errors identified in the initial calculations include neglecting the acceleration of the steamroller's body and misidentifying the instantaneous center of rotation of the wheels.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of torque and moment of inertia
  • Knowledge of angular acceleration and its relation to linear acceleration
  • Ability to draw and analyze free body diagrams (FBD)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the parallel axis theorem for calculating moments of inertia
  • Learn about free body diagram techniques for complex systems
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular motion in rigid bodies
  • Investigate the effects of friction on inclined planes and rolling motion
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering disciplines, particularly those studying dynamics and mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to rotational motion and forces on inclined planes.

srecko97
Messages
82
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


There is a steamroller with total mass 12000 kg on a 4° slope. It has 2 wheels (full homogeneous cylinders) with mass 3000 kg (each one 3000 kg) and diameter 1,2 m (radius 0,6 m). How big would the acceleration of the steamroller be if brakes got broken.

Result: 0.56 m/s^2

Homework Equations


J=1/2 mr^2

M=J*α

(J-moment of inertia, M-torque, α-angular acceleration)

The Attempt at a Solution


i assumed that the gravity forces of steamroller on the axis of wheels is equal (half-half). I tried to write torques on one of the wheels. 12000 kg (whole steamroller) - 3000 kg (wheel1) - 3000 kg(wheel2) = 6000 kg (driver, cabin, engine ...) --> 3000 kg on each wheel[/B]

image.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had a hard time following your work. Maybe I just didn't take enough time to look at it closely.

But if I had a simple mass on a 4 degree frictionless slope, the acceleration of that mass would be much less than the answer you came up with for the steamroller. So there is definitely something wrong with your solution, since the acceleration of the steamroller should be less than a mass sliding on a frictionless surface.

If you haven't already, I recommend that you draw a free body diagram for the steam roller and sum the forces based on that FBD. Then you can sum torques on one of the rollers. This should result in 2 equations and 2 unknowns.
 
srecko97 said:

Homework Statement


There is a steamroller with total mass 12000 kg on a 4° slope. It has 2 wheels (full homogeneous cylinders) with mass 3000 kg (each one 3000 kg) and diameter 1,2 m (radius 0,6 m). How big would the acceleration of the steamroller be if brakes got broken.

Result: 0.56 m/s^2

Homework Equations


J=1/2 mr^2

M=J*α

(J-moment of inertia, M-torque, α-angular acceleration)

The Attempt at a Solution


i assumed that the gravity forces of steamroller on the axis of wheels is equal (half-half). I tried to write torques on one of the wheels. 12000 kg (whole steamroller) - 3000 kg (wheel1) - 3000 kg(wheel2) = 6000 kg (driver, cabin, engine ...) --> 3000 kg on each wheel[/B]

image.jpg
Two errors.
  1. You have neglected the acceleration of the body of the steamroller.
  2. The instantaneous centre of rotation of the wheel is the point of contact with the road, not the wheel's centre. There are two ways to fix that. You can either use the parallel axis theorem or include the mass of the wheel in the linear acceleration of the body of the steamroller.
 
The given answer seems a little high. I get the acceleration = 0.54728 m/s^2.
The difference could lie in the value used for g. I used g = 9.807 m/s^2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K