Accelerating a car including the moment of inertia of the wheels

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a car considering the moment of inertia of its wheels. The car has an engine torque of τ = 200 Nm applied to the front wheels, each weighing m = 15 kg with a radius R = 0.35 m, while the rest of the car has a mass of M = 1000 kg. The final formula derived for acceleration is a = 2τ / R(M + 6m), which incorporates both the rotational and translational dynamics of the system. Participants emphasize the importance of using correct free body diagrams and torque equations to arrive at the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics, specifically moment of inertia (I = 1/2mR²).
  • Familiarity with torque calculations (τ = F * R).
  • Knowledge of Newton's second law for linear motion (F = ma).
  • Ability to draw and interpret free body diagrams for complex systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between linear and angular motion, particularly the equations linking torque and angular acceleration.
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in rotational systems, including kinetic energy equations for both linear and rotational motion.
  • Explore the implications of friction in rolling motion and its effect on acceleration.
  • Investigate the impulse-momentum theorem and its application in dynamic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering disciplines, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of vehicle motion and the interplay between rotational and translational forces.

  • #31
lichenguy said:
I started with:
2τΔθ = 1/2Mv2 + 4*1/2mv2 + 4*1/2Iω2
then
v2 = 2τΔθ/(1/2)M+3m

Next i have to multiply the denominator by 2(xf-xi)=2RΔθ, that's what gives me the factor of 6. Did you get the factor of 3 earlier?

Can the OP or someone else explain how that equation was simplified to get a factor of 3 in the denominator for "m"?
The original equation involves a term with rotational kinetic energy (1/2Iω2).

Was that "I" for the object's inertia converted to some kind of equivalent mass?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
NewtonianAlch said:
Can the OP or someone else explain how that equation was simplified to get a factor of 3 in the denominator for "m"?
The original equation involves a term with rotational kinetic energy (1/2Iω2).

Was that "I" for the object's inertia converted to some kind of equivalent mass?
Each wheel is treated as a uniform, solid cylinder for which I = (1/2)mR2. Also, for rolling without slipping, ω = v/R.
 
  • Like
Likes NewtonianAlch
  • #33
TSny said:
Each wheel is treated as a uniform, solid cylinder for which I = (1/2)mR2. Also, for rolling without slipping, ω = v/R.

Thank you.

I was using I = mR2, hence why it didn't come out the same.
 
  • #34
NewtonianAlch said:
Thank you.

I was using I = mR2, hence why it didn't come out the same.
OK. Glad it makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K