I A textbook passage describing coordinate lines in physical space

  • Thread starter Thread starter gnnmartin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In curved space, geodesics appear curved when compared to straight lines in the coordinate system. The discussion references a textbook, likely "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, which illustrates this concept. A distinction is made that this phenomenon is not exclusive to curved spaces; even in flat spacetime with curved coordinates, inertial paths appear curved. The user seeks a more quotable first-person description of this concept, as opposed to the third-person perspective provided in the textbook's figures. The search continues for a memorable quote that encapsulates this visualization of coordinates in curved space.
gnnmartin
Messages
86
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
A picture illustrating coordinate lines 'swooping' through physical space.
In curved space, geodesics are curved relative to lines which are straight in the coordinate system. I remember seeing a text book that illustrated the corollary, the coordinate lines 'swooping' through physical space. I wish to reference it. I thought it was in 'Gravitation' by Milner Thorn & Wheeler, but if it is, I can't find it now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might help. Gravitation, Misner, Thorne & Wheeler, 2017, page 4:
1745422098549.png

AM
 
gnnmartin said:
In curved space, geodesics are curved relative to lines which are straight in the coordinate system.
Just to note, this isn't particular to curved spaces. If you have curved coordinates in flat spacetime, inertial paths will be represented by curved lines in coordinate space.
 
Andrew Mason said:
This might help. Gravitation, Misner, Thorne & Wheeler, 2017, page 4:
View attachment 360283
AM
Thanks. I was aware of the M T &W's figure, but it is rather a 'third person' view annd not very quotable. The description I thought I remember reading talks about a first person view: someone in curved space visualising the coordinates. I thought I remembered a rather snappy quotable sentence, but can't remember it or whose it was.
 
Thanks.
 
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K