A theory for a FIFTH dimension .

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Don Cristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a fifth dimension, with one participant proposing that matter itself could be considered this dimension. The conversation explores the definitions of dimensions in physics, the relationship between mass, matter, and spacetime, and the philosophical implications of these ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Philosophical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if time is the fourth dimension, then matter could logically be considered the fifth dimension, arguing that matter is essential for the existence of the other dimensions.
  • Another participant challenges this idea, asserting that a dimension is defined as a necessary number to specify an event, and that events can occur independently of mass.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between mass and spacetime, with one stating that mass does not define a location in spacetime, while another argues that mass is integral to the structure of spacetime.
  • A later reply acknowledges that while the idea of mass as a dimension is not traditionally accepted, it is not entirely unfounded, suggesting that mass and energy could relate to the concept of dimensions in a more complex way.
  • Philosophical questions arise regarding whether spacetime owes its existence to mass or vice versa, with some participants noting that this is a matter for further exploration in quantum gravity.
  • There is a discussion about the mathematical definitions of dimensions, with one participant explaining how dimensions are treated in physics and how mass relates to other fundamental quantities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the validity of considering matter as a fifth dimension. Some agree that the relationship between mass and spacetime is complex and worthy of exploration, while others maintain that mass does not fit the definition of a dimension.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the definitions of dimensions and the nature of mass and spacetime, which remain unresolved. The philosophical implications of these ideas are also noted, indicating a broader context for the discussion.

  • #31
What part about definition of dimension don't you understand?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Well instead of being so critical Mr 'Eh', perhaps you would like to explain to me (without reference to Matter) why an atom collides? Until then, take your restricted views elsewhere.
 
  • #33
I already told you why an atom collides has nothing to with the definition of a dimension. And that's just it - matter doesn't fit the definition. You could just as well call it cotton candy.
 
  • #34
You clearly have not understood what I meant and also you could not answer my question. I know what you are trying to say but think about it from a different perspective!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
Shouldn't this nonsense be in the theory development forum? Oh wait.

- Warren
 
  • #36
Originally posted by chroot
Shouldn't this nonsense be in the theory development forum? Oh wait.

- Warren

Firstly, that was an utterly pointless post. Secondly, bluntly labelling the theory as "Nonsense" without argument is not necessary and shows ignorance. I know the theory is debateable and unlikely but please contribute to the debate before criticism.
Thanks. (sigh)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
Does anyone else have anything to add to this discussion? I would very much like to see anybody's views on the topic.
Thanks
 
  • #38
Originally posted by Don Cristo
...it IS a philosophical matter...

Then post the topic in the philosophy section.
 
  • #39
Originally posted by steinitz
Then post the topic in the philosophy section.

You have dissapointed me Mr Steinitz - I thought you were above insolence and stupidity. I am sure you can come up with a cleverer and more relevant remark that that. Good day.
 
  • #40
[zz)]
 
  • #41
Originally posted by steinitz
[zz)]

You are a pathetic individual. You have patronized me for no good reason and you have made a mockery of me. You belong in the gutters for this atrocity. May you be stung by a thousand tempestuous scorpions, you amalgamation of loathsome repulsiveness. May you also be chased across the desert by sex-starved camels, you whose word is worthless I hope, pray and dream that you shall be dragged through the disease-ridden medieval sty by a demented pig, you grudge-festering scar on the face of beauty.
 
  • #42
I wonder how many hours you had to spend with a thesaurus to write that stupid reply.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

Undergrad What Shapes Can Extra Dimensions Take in String Theory?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Undergrad Trying To Conceptualize Two Dimensions Of Time
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Graduate The Emergence of Space-time in String Theory
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
Graduate Different symmetries or no symmetries in string theory?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
687
Undergrad Ads/CFT and Ashtekar variables or spinfoam
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Graduate "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Graduate Could photons be 2D objects in String Theory?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
High School The dimension of time in String Theory
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Why does physics consider only 3 of 6 dimensions
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K