A theory for a FIFTH dimension .

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Don Cristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the proposition of a fifth dimension, proposed by a 16-year-old user, which suggests that matter itself could be considered a dimension, following the established four dimensions of height, depth, length, and time. Various forum members engage in a debate about the definition of dimensions, with some asserting that mass and spacetime are not interchangeable concepts, while others acknowledge the philosophical implications of the theory. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding dimensions in physics and encourages further exploration of the relationship between mass, spacetime, and potential additional dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the four dimensions: height, depth, length, and time.
  • Basic knowledge of mass and its relationship to spacetime.
  • Familiarity with philosophical implications in physics discussions.
  • Awareness of the definitions and properties of dimensions in mathematics and physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical definition of dimensions in physics.
  • Explore the relationship between mass and spacetime in general relativity.
  • Investigate philosophical perspectives on dimensions and their implications in physics.
  • Learn about string theory and its proposed additional dimensions beyond the familiar four.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, aspiring physicists, and anyone interested in the philosophical aspects of dimensions and their implications in understanding the universe.

  • #31
What part about definition of dimension don't you understand?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Well instead of being so critical Mr 'Eh', perhaps you would like to explain to me (without reference to Matter) why an atom collides? Until then, take your restricted views elsewhere.
 
  • #33
I already told you why an atom collides has nothing to with the definition of a dimension. And that's just it - matter doesn't fit the definition. You could just as well call it cotton candy.
 
  • #34
You clearly have not understood what I meant and also you could not answer my question. I know what you are trying to say but think about it from a different perspective!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
Shouldn't this nonsense be in the theory development forum? Oh wait.

- Warren
 
  • #36
Originally posted by chroot
Shouldn't this nonsense be in the theory development forum? Oh wait.

- Warren

Firstly, that was an utterly pointless post. Secondly, bluntly labelling the theory as "Nonsense" without argument is not necessary and shows ignorance. I know the theory is debateable and unlikely but please contribute to the debate before criticism.
Thanks. (sigh)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
Does anyone else have anything to add to this discussion? I would very much like to see anybody's views on the topic.
Thanks
 
  • #38
Originally posted by Don Cristo
...it IS a philosophical matter...

Then post the topic in the philosophy section.
 
  • #39
Originally posted by steinitz
Then post the topic in the philosophy section.

You have dissapointed me Mr Steinitz - I thought you were above insolence and stupidity. I am sure you can come up with a cleverer and more relevant remark that that. Good day.
 
  • #40
[zz)]
 
  • #41
Originally posted by steinitz
[zz)]

You are a pathetic individual. You have patronized me for no good reason and you have made a mockery of me. You belong in the gutters for this atrocity. May you be stung by a thousand tempestuous scorpions, you amalgamation of loathsome repulsiveness. May you also be chased across the desert by sex-starved camels, you whose word is worthless I hope, pray and dream that you shall be dragged through the disease-ridden medieval sty by a demented pig, you grudge-festering scar on the face of beauty.
 
  • #42
I wonder how many hours you had to spend with a thesaurus to write that stupid reply.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

Undergrad What Shapes Can Extra Dimensions Take in String Theory?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Undergrad Trying To Conceptualize Two Dimensions Of Time
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Graduate The Emergence of Space-time in String Theory
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
Graduate Different symmetries or no symmetries in string theory?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
510
Undergrad Ads/CFT and Ashtekar variables or spinfoam
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Graduate "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Graduate Could photons be 2D objects in String Theory?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
High School The dimension of time in String Theory
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Why does physics consider only 3 of 6 dimensions
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K