Mr Smailes
- 16
- 0
E/2 = 1/2kx^2
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between kinetic energy (K.E.) and potential energy (P.E.) in a system involving a trolley oscillating between two springs. Participants clarify that K.E. and P.E. are equal at a specific displacement between the equilibrium position and maximum amplitude. The maximum potential energy occurs at the extremes of the oscillation, while kinetic energy is maximized at the equilibrium position. The conversation emphasizes the conservation of energy principle, stating that the sum of K.E. and P.E. remains constant throughout the motion.
PREREQUISITESStudents studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory systems, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to energy conservation in spring systems.
It looks as if you are trying to take two steps at once. How does this compare to what I learned, that ##E = {1\over 2} kx^2 ## ?Mr Smailes said:E/2 = 1/2kx^2
I previously defined E in this thread as the max KE.BvU said:It looks as if you are trying to take two steps at once. How does this compare to what I learned, that ##E = {1\over 2} kx^2 ## ?
Right.Mr Smailes said:E/2 = 1/2kx^2
Mr Smailes said:E/2 = 1/2k(x/2)^2 and E = 1/2kx^2
That is clearly false. You seem to be assuming the answer, and a wrong one.Mr Smailes said:E/2 = 1/2k(x/2)^2 and E = 1/2kx^2
Well, it really is not that difficult.Mr Smailes said:To be honest this has confused me further now, I am really not sure where I am going with these equations for a 1 mark question there must be a simpler way to visualise and understand this problem
I'm just asking for the equations you had in post #35 but with ##x_{E/2}## instead of "x/2" and ##x_E## instead of the other ##x##.Mr Smailes said:Can you show that?
If you are saying that is the result you get by following what I asked you to do in post #41 then you have made a mistake. Please post your working.Mr Smailes said:Equate to XE/2=XE/2